Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Gemini 2.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.5 to 15.5, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 4.2x less per output token ($0.60 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
9
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
34.3
Output $/M
$2.50
0
vs boards won of 9 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Gemini 2.5 Flash: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
9
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
30
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
64
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 36.9 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1357 against Gemini 2.5 Flash 1004, 44.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 per million output tokens, 4.2x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGemini 2.5 FlashTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Web design60
General10
All shared boards90
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 2.5 FlashLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured28.7%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured69.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SciCode55.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.6%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured17.1%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1423Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1425Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 2.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.515.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured142.9Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 2.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1245Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured31.6%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BALROGNot measured33.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$549Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured56.2%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured39.9%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 2.5 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.0%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%12.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
ARC-AGINot measured33.3%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured2.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleBenchNot measured41.2%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Mystery game puzzles49.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1422Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1426Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1420Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1245Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1244Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured56.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 2.5 FlashLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured73.3Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.3%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1411Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1422Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 2.5 FlashLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.2%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1433Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1428Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1430Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1404Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured47.2%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 2.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites13111074DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13031002DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13571004DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301060DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13581020DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13321059DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1020Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1242Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 2.5 FlashLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured50.3%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%65.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured76.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMCANot measured27.5%Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1417Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1405Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1400Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1235Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1418Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1409Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1449Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1417Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1396Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1385Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1432Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1422Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1415Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1413Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1408Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1419Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1405Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1393Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1239Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1284Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1237Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1225Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1277Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1252Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1241Only Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini 2.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.0015Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.085Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemini 2.5 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Google Gemini 2.5 Flash
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026June 17, 2025
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.60$2.50
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.466
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Gemini 2.5 Flash for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 2.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Gemini 2.5 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next