Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads DeepSeek V3.2 on coding, 54.7 to 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 3.1x less per output token ($0.28 vs $0.88 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek
Coding
30.0
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.88
3
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
54.7
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$0.28
32
vs boards won of 35 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for DeepSeek V3.2.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for work measured by LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: Japanese, where it leads.

Shared results
35
DeepSeek V3.2 only
40
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
31
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 34.7 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V3.2 5.1% against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 79.0%, 73.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.88 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 3.1x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2BarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge13
General216
All shared boards332
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
SWE-bench Verified70.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual59.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev13621634MiMo-V2.6-Flash
AA Coding Index44.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured24.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)5.1%79.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SciCodeNot measured51.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench39.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.2Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14531499MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14491497MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: React13501648MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML13711641MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1596Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.537.9MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
APEX-Agents21.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Vending-Bench 2$1,034Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)24.6%35.1%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ARC-AGI57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14341475MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: expert14361496MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14461493MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1276Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AIME84.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Math Index92.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ProofBenchNot measured63.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: math14351476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14401478MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MMLU Pro84.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: science14461462MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14401439DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: legal and government14251441MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14101454MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1175Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: UI components1146Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: game dev1131Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1158Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1132Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1163Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1083Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index216
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IFBench60.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%74.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
DTBench85.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMCA28.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CL-bench12.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CL-bench Life7.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text14251453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14131452MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14001403MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1256Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14391476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14091431MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14551509MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: German14131458MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13741359DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Korean13701425MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: French14291480MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14241453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14241409DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Polish14191455MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14271447MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14281459MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14071424MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13951415MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1231Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.0007Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.017Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.067Exceeds the context window
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerDeepSeekXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 1, 2025September 21, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.29$0.14
Output $/Mtok$0.88$0.28
Coding index30.054.7
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for DeepSeek V3.2. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for work measured by LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: Japanese, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.88 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V3.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-flash" title="DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash</a></p>