Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Exp on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 46.4 to 16.6, and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 14.6x less per output token ($0.41 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 42 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
22
Grok 4.7xAI
Coding
66.7
Overall
66.6
Output $/M
$6.00
20
vs boards won of 42 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Grok 4.7: which to pick

Only Grok 4.7 has a coding score, 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 14.6x cheaper ($0.41 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
42
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
17
Grok 4.7 only
57
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, Grok 4.7 66.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 27.3 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 1281 against Grok 4.7 1627, 53.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Grok 4.7 $6.00 per million output tokens, 14.6x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Grok 4.7 500K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsGrok 4.7Ties
Coding22
Intelligence02
Reasoning22
Math11
Knowledge31
Web design06
General146
All shared boards2220
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGrok 4.7Leader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveBench codingNot measured84.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev12721637Grok 4.7
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured28.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured86.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured57.7%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured73.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.9%Only Grok 4.7 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SciCodeNot measured57.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
FrontierCodeNot measured47.6%Only Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierSWENot measured29.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding14381432DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: software and IT14381421DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1663Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12811627Grok 4.7
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1586Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGrok 4.7Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.646.4Grok 4.7
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9154.4Grok 4.7
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGrok 4.7Leader
LiveBench researchNot measured86.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured60.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured50.1%Only Grok 4.7 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured3.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured52.3%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured34.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.1%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured18.3%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured10.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured34.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured54.6%Only Grok 4.7 measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$10,537Only Grok 4.7 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGrok 4.7Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured82.7%Only Grok 4.7 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured25.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%43.1%Grok 4.7
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Grok 4.7 measured
ARC-AGINot measured90.2%Only Grok 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured61.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured41.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured29.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291415DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: expert14221439Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441427DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1254Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1309Only Grok 4.7 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGrok 4.7Leader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.1%Only Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured53.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured17.1%Only Grok 4.7 measured
ProofBenchNot measured26.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: math14221414DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331435Grok 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGrok 4.7Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.5%Only Grok 4.7 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured56.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: science14431419DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681395DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: legal and government14191423Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: business and finance14121389DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGrok 4.7Leader
Design Arena: websites11781255Grok 4.7
Design Arena: UI components11641275Grok 4.7
Design Arena: game dev11441314Grok 4.7
Design Arena: data viz11521238Grok 4.7
Design Arena: 3D11481274Grok 4.7
Design Arena: all code categories11701273Grok 4.7
Design Arena: SVG1031Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.0%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index146
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGrok 4.7Leader
Vals IndexNot measured58.6%Only Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.9%Only Grok 4.7 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured65.6%Only Grok 4.7 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured89.4%Only Grok 4.7 measured
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%80.0%Grok 4.7
DTBench87.7%96.0%Grok 4.7
LMCA29.1%49.4%Grok 4.7
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Grok 4.7 measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251399DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: instruction following14011406Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: creative writing14041381DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena VisionNot measured1231Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: English14411411DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: non-English14041386DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Chinese14611449DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: German14401366DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Japanese13311359Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: Korean13721383Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: French14341431DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Spanish14411406DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Russian14121399DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Polish14351420DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221394DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: longer queries14181416DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: writing and language14071394DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071376DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1229Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1250Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1241Only Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1217Only Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGrok 4.7Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Grok 4.7$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Grok 4.7$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Grok 4.7$0.460Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Grok 4.7
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSpaceXAI Grok 4.7
MakerDeepSeekxAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025September 21, 2026
Context window164K500K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.41$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked66.7
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Grok 4.7 for coding?

Only Grok 4.7 has a coding score, 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 14.6x cheaper ($0.41 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Grok 4.7?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7, with 500K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Grok 4.7 comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Grok 4.7's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next