Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Exp on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 36.0 to 16.6, and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 4.8x less per output token ($0.41 vs $1.98 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
2
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
33
vs boards won of 35 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 4.8x cheaper ($0.41 vs $1.98 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: Spanish, where it leads.

Shared results
35
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
24
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
43
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 25.5 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 1281 against DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1566, 47.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 per million output tokens, 4.8x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Ties
Coding05
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge13
General116
All shared boards233
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev12721582DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
AA Coding IndexNot measured68.8Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured96.4%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured14.1%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured82.3%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured41.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured51.6%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.8%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.9%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SciCodeNot measured51.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
FrontierCodeNot measured28.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML39.5%66.2%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ALE-BenchNot measured1403.2Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: coding14381469DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: software and IT14381462DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1588Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12811566DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.636.0DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9155.6DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured41.3Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.9%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.4%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.8%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured10.8%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured47.3%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.4%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%92.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%41.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured91.7%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGINot measured90.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured61.3%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured43.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291458DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: expert14221459DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441463DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.6%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured64.6%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBenchNot measured50.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: math14221441DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331443DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.4%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured52.9%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: science14431457DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681446DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: legal and government14191459DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: business and finance14121442DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
Design Arena: websites1178Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI components1164Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev1144Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1170Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1031Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index116
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
Vals IndexNot measured53.0%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.2%Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%80.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DTBench87.7%93.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMCA29.1%45.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251446DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: instruction following14011448DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: creative writing14041439DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: English14411457DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: non-English14041431DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Chinese14611481DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: German1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1331Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Korean13721449DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: French14341446DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Spanish14411435DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Russian14121448DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: Polish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221454DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: longer queries14181458DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: writing and language14071443DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071424DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
MakerDeepSeekDeepSeek
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025August 12, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.66
Output $/Mtok$0.41$1.98
Coding indexNot benchmarked56.1
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.10
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a coding score, 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 4.8x cheaper ($0.41 vs $1.98 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: Spanish, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 and $1.98. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next