Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 14.8, and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs 5.9x less per output token ($1.0142 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.0142
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
62.4
Overall
68.9
Output $/M
$6.00
35
vs boards won of 35 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 5.9x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
35
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus only
10
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
79
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 62.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 49.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Agentic Index: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 6.8 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 56.0, 49.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $1.0142 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 5.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 164K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusBarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning04
Math01
Knowledge04
Web design06
General014
All shared boards035
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1674Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding Index43.576.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
SciCode38.0%53.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench745.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: coding14251502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14261498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1692Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1649Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index14.845.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic Index6.856.0Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1190Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1232Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured993Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom37.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.4%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261496Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1507Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14321503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Math Index89.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)89.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: math14021501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MathArenaNot measured51.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science14511512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14571492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance14141480Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites11871275Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components11801336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev11311312Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz11681282Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3D11411336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: all code categories11751292Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: SVG1065Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBench81.3%92.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMCA28.6%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text14191483Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following14041481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing14031477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English14291491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English14081473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1539Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1478Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1460Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Russian14351482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish14271471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn14111489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries14221488Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language14091477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13911464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.018Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.071Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window164K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.3063$2.00
Output $/Mtok$1.0142$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked62.4
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 62.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 5.9x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs $0.3063 per million input tokens and $1.0142 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next