Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Updated October 21, 2026. 38 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
71.4
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$2.15
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
65.1
Overall
39.6
Output $/M
$4.25
38
vs boards won of 38 shared

Decision reading

Pick R1 0528 for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.1 for Muse Spark 1.2, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is WeirdML or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
38
R1 0528 only
21
Muse Spark 1.2 only
59
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 71.4 from 1 benchmark, Muse Spark 1.2 65.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 26.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
SimpleBench: R1 0528 40.8% against Muse Spark 1.2 74.5%, 33.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.15 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design07
General015
All shared boards038
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkR1 0528Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SciCodeNot measured57.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdML41.6%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
ALE-Bench804.1Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: coding14271505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT14351505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkR1 0528Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.139.6Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkR1 0528Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1182Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1228Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1179Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1135Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1198Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkR1 0528Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%90.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI21.2%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI-21.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleBench40.8%74.5%Muse Spark 1.2
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert13941475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkR1 0528Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Math Index76.0Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkR1 0528Muse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: science14301500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government14191517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance14021484Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkR1 0528Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websites11491313Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: UI components11021300Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: game dev10981302Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: data viz11821334Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: 3D11111301Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: all code categories11391313Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: SVG10381285Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index015
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkR1 0528Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBench39.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%79.0%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMCANot measured48.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text14281482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following13821462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing14051436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena VisionNot measured1304Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: English14371483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English14121476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese14421509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1404Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1391Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Korean13601462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: French14171495Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Spanish14111484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian14231483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Polish1428Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries13911473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language14021453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkR1 0528Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.031Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.121Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528Meta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerDeepSeekMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 28, 2025August 5, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$1.25
Output $/Mtok$2.15$4.25
Coding index71.465.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Pick R1 0528 for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.1 for Muse Spark 1.2, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick Muse Spark 1.2 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 164K tokens, or when what matters is WeirdML or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Muse Spark 1.2?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.15 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.2's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next