Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash leads DeepSeek V3.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 13.7, and DeepSeek V3.1 costs 2.5x less per output token ($1.50 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
13.7
Output $/M
$1.50
0
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
Coding
58.0
Overall
39.6
Output $/M
$3.75
10
vs boards won of 10 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 or Gemini 3.7 Flash: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($1.50 vs $3.75 per million).

Shared results
10
DeepSeek V3.1 only
0
Gemini 3.7 Flash only
102
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 not benchmarked, Gemini 3.7 Flash 58.0 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 28.4 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: SVG: DeepSeek V3.1 967 against Gemini 3.7 Flash 1283, 39.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 $1.50 against Gemini 3.7 Flash $3.75 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 takes 164K tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1BarsGemini 3.7 FlashTies
Intelligence01
Web design07
General02
All shared boards010
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured80.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1591Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.5Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured88.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured80.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured12.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured34.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured59.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierCodeNot measured43.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierSWENot measured20.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured904.3Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1499Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1587Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1593Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1599Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.739.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured158.0Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1223Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1208Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1230Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1242Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1264Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1235Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1053Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured56.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured28.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured59.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured34.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured7.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Remote Labor IndexNot measured5.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured87.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured94.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured95.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured84.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured66.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1512Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1487Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1329Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1320Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured97.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured71.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured36.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1511Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1502Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured90.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured53.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured69.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1511Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1494Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1496Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1479Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites11231304Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: UI components10851299Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: game dev10841318Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: data viz10951315Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: 3D10771308Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories11121308Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: SVG9671283Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1276Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench designNot measured73.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured68.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
DTBench82.7%96.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMCA24.3%50.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Furniture assemblyNot measured26.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1489Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1484Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1488Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1314Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1483Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1487Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1552Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1506Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1511Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1481Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1500Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1515Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1503Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1485Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1492Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1491Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1477Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1309Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1394Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1299Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.0013Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.032Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.049Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.125Exceeds the context window
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.188Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1Google Gemini 3.7 Flash
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 21, 2025August 13, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.55$0.75
Output $/Mtok$1.50$3.75
Coding indexNot benchmarked58.0
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.78
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 better than Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding?

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($1.50 vs $3.75 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 and $3.75. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.7 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.7 Flash's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next