Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs Grok 4.6

Command R (08-2024) costs 10.0x less per output token than Grok 4.6 ($0.60 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Grok 4.6xAI
Coding
65.7
Overall
67.4
Output $/M
$6.00
25
vs boards won of 25 shared

Command R (08-2024) or Grok 4.6: which to pick

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command R (08-2024) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
25
Command R (08-2024) only
0
Grok 4.6 only
98
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, Grok 4.6 65.7 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 44.9 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Command R (08-2024) 1173 against Grok 4.6 1469, 49.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against Grok 4.6 $6.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, Grok 4.6 500K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand R (08-2024)BarsGrok 4.6Ties
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General014
All shared boards025
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Grok 4.6Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured89.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1617Only Grok 4.6 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.8Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured88.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured95.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured17.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured44.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured78.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SciCodeNot measured56.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured48.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
WeirdMLNot measured67.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1508.1Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding11871466Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT11971457Grok 4.6
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1631Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1597Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1603Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Grok 4.6Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured44.3Only Grok 4.6 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured156.6Only Grok 4.6 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Grok 4.6Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured53.0Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1248Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1264Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1236Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1297Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1276Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1208Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1249Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1241Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured84.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured64.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured48.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured11.4%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured38.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured5.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured65.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$9,047Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Grok 4.6Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured94.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured91.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.9%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured44.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured94.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGINot measured87.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured67.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured75.9%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
EBR-benchNot measured30.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11861448Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: expert11731469Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11941445Grok 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1285Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Grok 4.6Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured99.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured66.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured31.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ProofBenchNot measured51.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math11881417Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: mathematical work11981464Grok 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Grok 4.6Leader
MMLU ProNot measured89.4%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured44.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured49.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science12521437Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12381420Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: legal and government12681429Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance12151416Grok 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Grok 4.6Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1289Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1295Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1296Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1282Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1277Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1292Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1239Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1278Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench designNot measured79.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Grok 4.6Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured75.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured66.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured28.9%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured86.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured81.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
DTBenchNot measured97.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMCANot measured48.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured40.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text12291429Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following11971431Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing12341426Grok 4.6
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English12381433Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English12161420Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese12271476Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: German12161426Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: Japanese11661378Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: Korean11621391Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1455Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1414Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian12271421Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12131425Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries12301456Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language12411429Grok 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12231421Grok 4.6
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1270Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1289Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1272Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1270Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1262Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1452Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Grok 4.6Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
Grok 4.6$0.0050Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
Grok 4.6$0.118Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Grok 4.6$0.460Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and Grok 4.6
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)SpaceXAI Grok 4.6
MakerCoherexAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024August 12, 2026
Context window128K500K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked65.7
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.82
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than Grok 4.6 for coding?

Only Grok 4.6 has a coding score, 65.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command R (08-2024) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or Grok 4.6?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6, with 500K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Command R (08-2024) vs Grok 4.6 comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command R (08-2024)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.6's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next