Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 54 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
32.3
Overall
29.7
Output $/M
$12.00
54
vs boards won of 54 shared

Decision reading

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a coding score, 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A has the edge where output tokens cost 1.2x less.

Shared results
54
Command A only
6
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
77
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 47.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME: Command A 13.3% against Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 98.1%, 84.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewTies
Coding08
Intelligence01
Agentic work03
Reasoning06
Math03
Knowledge011
General022
All shared boards054
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
Coding benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1447Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
AA Coding Index27.868.8Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%88.5%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%78.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured2.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured17.3%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured51.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%70.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured6.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SciCode38.5%58.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%53.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-BenchNot measured80.2%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GSO-BenchNot measured22.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdMLNot measured72.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCodeNot measured8.9%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1160.6Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding13301484Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT13361487Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1438Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1490Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1481Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.129.7Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index1.08.2Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1125Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1068Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1094Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1056Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1236Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1114Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1153Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1065Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%43.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured52.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured60.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured27.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%95.6%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
APEX-AgentsNot measured35.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
METR time horizonsNot measured77.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROGNot measured57.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured47.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBenchNot measured22.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$911Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond48.5%95.5%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured20.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.2%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%94.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%47.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured94.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGINot measured98.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured77.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBenchNot measured79.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured51.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EBR-benchNot measured14.3%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261485Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: expert12961483Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351480Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1311Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1316Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
AIME13.3%98.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured59.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBenchNot measured26.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: math13001486Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121478Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index011
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro69.2%91.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%87.4%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%64.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%64.5%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%72.9%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%96.4%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%59.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured73.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: science13391497Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341486Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government13481487Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13151459Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1234Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1227Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1203Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1209Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1234Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1231Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1285Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1270Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index022
General benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured53.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured48.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%76.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured56.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBench73.9%77.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%82.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
DTBench61.3%97.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMCA10.3%53.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CL-benchNot measured20.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured26.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBenchNot measured26.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured16.9%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text13311480Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13091466Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing13191482Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena VisionNot measured1296Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: English13441478Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: non-English13131476Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese13271527Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: German13421490Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Japanese12851491Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Korean12851455Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: French13511487Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish13471481Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Russian13141497Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Polish13241498Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381487Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13341482Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13281481Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061465Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1287Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1364Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1304Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1322Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1345Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1330Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1324Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request

Command A costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
SpecificationCohere Command AGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MakerCohereGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025February 19, 2026
Context window256K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$12.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked32.3
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved task$2.69$0.99
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for coding?

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a coding score, 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A has the edge where output tokens cost 1.2x less.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 and $12.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Command A costs $2.69 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $0.99.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview comparison based on?

54 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next