Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads Command A on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.7 to 13.1, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 12.8x less per output token ($0.78 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$10.00
0
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
62.5
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$0.78
39
vs boards won of 39 shared

Command A or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
39
Command A only
21
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
62
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 44.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI): Command A 17.6% against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 74.5%, 56.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.78 per million output tokens, 12.8x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge06
General021
All shared boards039
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1618Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
AA Coding Index27.8Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured19.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured84.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured40.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%74.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured46.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured16.4%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured73.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SciCode38.5%51.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
FrontierCodeNot measured43.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1092.3Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding13301502DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT13361496DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1628Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1612Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1606Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.124.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.9Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveBench researchNot measured86.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured84.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.1%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%53.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured39.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond48.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured86.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%39.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured89.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured94.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured72.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured48.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured43.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261483DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: expert12961501DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351488DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1297Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1307Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
AIME13.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured67.4%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured54.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math13001478DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121485DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro69.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%83.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%41.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured42.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science13391469DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341484DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government13481443DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance13151461DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1309Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1315Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1330Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1290Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1356Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1320Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1244Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1265Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench designNot measured79.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
General benchmarks for Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%85.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%84.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBench61.3%89.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMCA10.3%47.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured46.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured34.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text13311464DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following13091473DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing13191437DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1278Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English13441473DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English13131449DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese13271501DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: German13421470DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese12851432DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean12851436DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: French13511465DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish13471459DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian13141467DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish13241457DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381461DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries13341473DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language13281450DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061445DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1288Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1327Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1260Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1275Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0006Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.013Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SpecificationCohere Command ADeepSeek V4.1 Flash
MakerCohereDeepSeek
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025September 10, 2026
Context window256K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.21
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.78
Coding indexNot benchmarked62.5
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved task$2.69Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command A or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.21 and $0.78. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next