Command A+ vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Command A+Cohere
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.50
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
- Coding
- 73.5
- Overall
- 47.0
- Output $/M
- $20.00
vs $1.50 vs $20.00 per 1M output tokens. Command A+ is 13.3x cheaper.
Decision reading
Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a coding score, 73.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 13.3x less.
Model ACommand A+CohereNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BGPT-5.6 SolOpenAI73.5/1006 independent benchmarks$1.20 per solved task
- Shared results
- 0
- Command A+ only
- 0
- GPT-5.6 Sol only
- 136
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a AA Intelligence Index result, 47.0.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a AA Agentic Index result, 50.2.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a GPQA Diamond result, 95.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a MMLU Pro result, 89.1%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a Design Arena: websites result, 1321.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol takes 1.05M tokens against 192K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Command A+
Command A+ $0.0010, GPT-5.6 Sol $0.014 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Sol has the number, $1.20.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Command A+ not benchmarked, GPT-5.6 Sol 73.5 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- No category has a result for both models.
- Widest single gap
- No benchmark has a result for both models.
- Output price
- Command A+ $1.50 against GPT-5.6 Sol $20.00 per million output tokens, 13.3x apart.
- Context window
- Command A+ takes 192K tokens, GPT-5.6 Sol 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index27 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Sol | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 89.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1616 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 77.4 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 96.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 37.9% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 80.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.9% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 91.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 20.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 54.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 57.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 65.9% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 47.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 32.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 76.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 88.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| MirrorCode | Not measured | 20.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 2176.9 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1496 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1489 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1620 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1618 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1609 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Sol | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 47.0 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 162.8 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index28 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Sol | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 50.2 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1246 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1261 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1249 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1246 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1260 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1267 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1286 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1240 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 54.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 88.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 48.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 30.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 31.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 20.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 41.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 23.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 8.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 85.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 27.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| BALROG | Not measured | 60.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| PostTrainBench | Not measured | 36.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $9,619 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Search | Not measured | 1261 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Sol | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 95.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 91.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 94.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 49.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 93.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 97.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 92.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 64.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 59.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 58.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| EBR-bench | Not measured | 44.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1483 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1517 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1477 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1305 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1305 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Sol | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 100.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 89.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 82.9% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 83.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1473 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1496 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Sol | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 89.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 69.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1455 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1431 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1476 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1457 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Sol | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1321 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1336 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1368 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1322 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1385 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1341 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1316 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1303 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 81.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Sol | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 79.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 72.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 72.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 84.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 95.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 58.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 93.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 56.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1457 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1483 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1449 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1281 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1457 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1451 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1525 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1476 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1472 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1442 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1472 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1443 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1471 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1459 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1461 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1481 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1462 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1450 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1280 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1313 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1290 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1246 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1283 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1483 | Only GPT-5.6 Sol measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Sol | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Sol$0.014Fits in one request
Command A+ costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Sol$0.260Fits in one request
Command A+ costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.6 Sol$1.00Fits in one request
Command A+ costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Cohere Command A+ | OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | July 9, 2026 |
| Context window | 192K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $4.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $20.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 73.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $1.20 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Command A+ better than GPT-5.6 Sol for coding?
Only GPT-5.6 Sol has a coding score, 73.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 13.3x less.
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Sol costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.6 Sol only.
Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or GPT-5.6 Sol?
GPT-5.6 Sol, with 1.05M tokens against 192K.
How many benchmarks is the Command A+ vs GPT-5.6 Sol comparison based on?
0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A+'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.6 Sol's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.