Command A+ vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Command A+Cohere
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.50
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
- Coding
- 58.0
- Overall
- 37.3
- Output $/M
- $1.20
vs $1.50 vs $1.20 per 1M output tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna is 1.3x cheaper.
Decision reading
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Model ACommand A+CohereNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI58.0/1006 independent benchmarks$0.04 per solved task
No benchmark has tested both yet. Command A+ has none yet; GPT-5.6 Luna on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a AA Intelligence Index result, 37.3.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a AA Agentic Index result, 42.1.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a GPQA Diamond result, 91.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a MMLU Pro result, 86.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a Design Arena: websites result, 1256.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens against 192K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna
Command A+ $0.0010, GPT-5.6 Luna $0.0008 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has the number, $0.04.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Command A+ not benchmarked, GPT-5.6 Luna 58.0 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Command A+ $1.50 against GPT-5.6 Luna $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
- Context window
- Command A+ takes 192K tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 73.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1518 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 71.4 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 93.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 11.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 22.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 53.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 39.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 60.9% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1667.4 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1466 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1463 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1508 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1520 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1517 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 37.3 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 156.5 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 42.1 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 51.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 68.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 30.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 24.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 36.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 25.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 43.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| BALROG | Not measured | 45.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $4,095 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 91.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 85.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 91.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 39.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 91.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 88.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 59.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 46.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 43.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 21.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1451 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1478 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1460 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1273 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1282 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 98.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 82.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 61.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 60.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1459 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1470 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 86.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 42.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 41.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1433 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1399 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1446 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1439 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1256 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1250 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1195 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1211 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1122 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1231 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1194 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1142 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 76.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index34 boards measured
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 78.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 69.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 83.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 89.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 48.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 61.9% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 42.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1431 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1437 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1396 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1257 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1441 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1417 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1470 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1455 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1415 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1415 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1458 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1446 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1427 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1405 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1434 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1436 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1419 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1402 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1263 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1294 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1264 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1190 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1257 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1457 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.0008Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.014Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.052Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Cohere Command A+ | OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | July 9, 2026 |
| Context window | 192K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.20 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 58.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.04 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Command A+ better than GPT-5.6 Luna for coding?
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.6 Luna only.
Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 192K.
Has any benchmark tested both Command A+ and GPT-5.6 Luna?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Command A+ has none yet; GPT-5.6 Luna on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.