Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Codestral 2508 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 7 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Codestral 2508Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.90
0
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
32.3
Overall
29.7
Output $/M
$12.00
7
vs boards won of 7 shared

Decision reading

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a coding score, 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Codestral 2508 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Codestral 2508 has the edge where output tokens cost 13.3x less.

Shared results
7
Codestral 2508 only
0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
124
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Codestral 2508 not benchmarked, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 34.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Codestral 2508 137.8 against Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1160.6, 34.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Codestral 2508 $0.90 against Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 per million output tokens, 13.3x apart.
Context window
Codestral 2508 takes 256K tokens, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCodestral 2508BarsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewTies
Coding01
Web design06
All shared boards07
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1447Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured68.8Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured88.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured2.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured17.3%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured51.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured70.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured6.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCodeNot measured58.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured53.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured80.2%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GSO-BenchNot measured22.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdMLNot measured72.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCodeNot measured8.9%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench137.81160.6Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1484Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1487Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1438Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1490Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1481Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured29.7Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured8.2Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1125Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1068Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1094Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1056Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1236Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1114Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1153Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1065Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured43.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured52.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured60.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured27.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured35.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
METR time horizonsNot measured77.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROGNot measured57.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured47.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBenchNot measured22.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$911Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured95.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured20.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.2%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured94.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGINot measured98.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured77.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBenchNot measured79.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured51.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EBR-benchNot measured14.3%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1485Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1483Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1480Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1311Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1316Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
AIMENot measured98.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured59.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBenchNot measured26.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1486Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1478Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
MMLU ProNot measured91.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured64.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.9%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured59.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured73.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1497Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1486Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1487Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1459Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites10131234Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: UI components10171227Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: game dev9681203Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: data viz10171209Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: 3D10201234Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: all code categories10071231Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1285Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1270Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index38 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured53.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured48.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured56.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBenchNot measured77.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured82.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DTBenchNot measured97.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMCANot measured53.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-benchNot measured20.8%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured26.7%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBenchNot measured26.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured16.9%Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena TextNot measured1480Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1466Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1482Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1296Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1478Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1476Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1527Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1490Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1491Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1455Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1487Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1481Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1497Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1498Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1487Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1482Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1481Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1465Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1287Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1364Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1304Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1322Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1345Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1330Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1324Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Codestral 2508$0.0008Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request

Codestral 2508 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Codestral 2508$0.018Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request

Codestral 2508 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Codestral 2508$0.069Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request

Codestral 2508 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
SpecificationMistral Codestral 2508Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MakerMistral AIGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 1, 2025February 19, 2026
Context window256K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.90$12.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked32.3
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.99
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Codestral 2508 better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for coding?

Only Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a coding score, 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Codestral 2508 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Codestral 2508 has the edge where output tokens cost 13.3x less.

Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Codestral 2508 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 and $12.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Codestral 2508 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Codestral 2508 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Codestral 2508's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next