Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Claude Sonnet 5 leads Qwen3.7 Plus on coding, 57.7 to 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.7 Plus costs 7.8x less per output token ($1.28 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 71 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick
Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for coding: it scores 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 7.8x cheaper ($1.28 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by SkillsBench (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: science, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 71
- Claude Sonnet 5 only
- 50
- Qwen3.7 Plus only
- 4
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 scores 57.7 against 33.2.
6 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 leads, 38.2 against 25.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 leads, 43.6 against 17.5.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 88.9%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 5 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 leads, 1274 against 1269.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus
Claude Sonnet 5 $0.0070, Qwen3.7 Plus $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 5 has the number, $1.87.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Sonnet 5 57.7 from 6 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 20.6 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierCode: Claude Sonnet 5 42.7% against Qwen3.7 Plus 10.2%, 50.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Sonnet 5 $10.00 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 7.8x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Sonnet 5 | Bars | Qwen3.7 Plus | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 8 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 5 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 9 | 0 | ||
| Math | 4 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 3 | 2 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 2 | ||
| General | 9 | 20 | ||
| All shared boards | 46 | 25 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index81
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 74.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1540 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 71.5 | 55.9 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 82.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 79.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 10.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 81.3% | 46.4% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 44.4% | 12.9% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 45.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 74.5% | 52.8% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 13.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 46.5% | 54.3% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 70.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SciCode | 54.3% | 46.1% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 47.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| FrontierCode | 42.7% | 10.2% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| GSO-Bench | 37.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| WeirdML | 68.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1463.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1483 | 1473 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1474 | 1473 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1541 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1527 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1540 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SciCode | 10.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 38.2 | 25.2 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.9 | 147.0 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 43.6 | 17.5 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1245 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1249 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1215 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1225 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1225 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1227 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1218 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1216 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1021 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LiveBench research | 82.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 72.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 39.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 0.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 53.9% | 38.2% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 29.4% | 10.5% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 41.8% | 16.4% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 66.3% | 49.3% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 93.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| APEX-Agents | 54.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 2.8% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $6,378 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 88.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.1% | 90.0% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 41.3% | 35.6% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.5% | 87.9% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| SimpleBench | 60.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 45.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 35.0% | 17.0% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1461 | 1460 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1489 | 1466 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1464 | 1460 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1293 | 1292 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1311 | 1295 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 94.7% | 93.3% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 65.6% | 34.4% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 29.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| ProofBench | 77.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1467 | 1467 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1481 | 1470 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 70.0% | 66.2% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 47.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1460 | 1464 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1442 | 1464 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1454 | 1451 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1436 | 1435 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index62
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1274 | 1269 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1280 | 1261 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1278 | 1262 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1251 | 1276 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1261 | 1239 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1276 | 1269 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1193 | 1208 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1207 | 1143 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LiveBench design | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index920
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 71.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 66.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 48.9% | 39.3% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 76.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 68.8% | 53.9% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| IFBench | Not measured | 78.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.0% | 73.0% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| DTBench | 92.5% | 84.0% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMCA | 50.0% | 37.6% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1454 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1452 | 1439 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1416 | 1438 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Vision | 1273 | 1278 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: English | 1450 | 1458 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1431 | 1445 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1478 | 1509 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: German | 1442 | 1471 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1422 | 1412 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1412 | 1413 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: French | 1463 | 1472 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1438 | 1457 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1450 | 1457 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1425 | 1449 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1453 | 1459 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1462 | 1454 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1436 | 1437 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1411 | 1422 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1275 | 1280 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1331 | 1332 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1288 | 1288 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1261 | 1261 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1246 | 1258 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Document | 1466 | 1444 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | June 30, 2026 | June 3, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.32 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $1.28 |
| Coding index | 57.7 | 33.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.87 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?
Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for coding: it scores 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 7.8x cheaper ($1.28 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by SkillsBench (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: science, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Neither: both take 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?
71 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.