Claude Sonnet 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 leads Claude Sonnet 5 on coding, 70.3 to 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Spark 1.1 costs 2.4x less per output token ($4.25 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 95 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Sonnet 5 or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.7 for Claude Sonnet 5, though on 3 benchmarks against 6.
Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for work measured by AA Coding Index or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 95
- Claude Sonnet 5 only
- 26
- Muse Spark 1.1 only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 scores 70.3 against 57.7.
6 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 leads, 38.2 against 33.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 leads, 43.6 against 25.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 leads, 91.2% against 88.9%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 leads, 88.7% against 87.5%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 leads, 1274 against 1270.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Muse Spark 1.1
Claude Sonnet 5 $0.0070, Muse Spark 1.1 $0.0034 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Muse Spark 1.1
Claude Sonnet 5 $1.87, Muse Spark 1.1 $0.43.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Sonnet 5 57.7 from 6 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 13.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ProofBench: Claude Sonnet 5 77.0% against Muse Spark 1.1 39.0%, 38.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Sonnet 5 $10.00 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Sonnet 5 takes 1M tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Sonnet 5 | Bars | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 6 | 8 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 13 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 4 | 6 | ||
| Math | 1 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 9 | ||
| Web design | 3 | 5 | ||
| General | 8 | 24 | ||
| All shared boards | 38 | 56 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index68
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 74.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1540 | 1542 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| AA Coding Index | 71.5 | 71.3 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 82.4% | 85.9% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 79.6% | 82.0% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 10.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 81.3% | 72.2% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 44.4% | 31.1% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.0% | Tie |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 45.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 74.5% | 69.3% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 13.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 46.5% | 59.2% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 70.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SciCode | 54.3% | 58.8% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| FrontierCode | 42.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 37.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| WeirdML | 68.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1463.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1483 | 1498 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1474 | 1498 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1541 | 1532 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1527 | 1540 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1540 | 1540 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| SciCode | 10.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 38.2 | 33.7 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.9 | 154.1 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index132
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 43.6 | 25.8 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1245 | 1207 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1249 | 1199 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1214 | 1175 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1227 | 1178 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1225 | 1103 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1227 | 1183 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1168 | 1145 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1193 | 1134 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1077 | 1021 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LiveBench research | 82.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 72.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 39.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 0.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 53.9% | 57.2% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 29.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 41.8% | 38.0% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 66.3% | 56.4% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 54.5% | 31.8% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $6,378 | $6,520 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index46
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.9% | 91.2% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LiveBench reasoning | 88.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.0% | 86.6% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.1% | 89.8% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 41.3% | 46.2% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SimpleBench | 60.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 45.0% | 34.0% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 35.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1461 | 1485 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1489 | 1478 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1464 | 1480 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1293 | 1305 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1311 | 1287 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 94.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 65.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 29.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| ProofBench | 77.0% | 39.0% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1467 | 1482 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1481 | 1487 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.5% | 88.7% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.9% | 85.0% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 67.0% | 71.3% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.6% | 79.7% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 70.0% | 66.1% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 47.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.7% | 57.8% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1460 | 1484 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1442 | 1479 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1454 | 1481 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1436 | 1470 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1274 | 1270 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1277 | 1287 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1276 | 1269 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1252 | 1267 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1260 | 1259 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1275 | 1276 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1192 | 1234 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1207 | 1269 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LiveBench design | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index824
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 71.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 66.0% | 61.3% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 48.9% | 45.6% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 76.0% | 88.9% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 68.8% | 66.7% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.0% | 77.7% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| DTBench | 92.5% | 94.4% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMCA | 50.0% | 49.9% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 60.0% | 52.5% | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1478 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1452 | 1457 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1416 | 1435 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision | 1273 | 1293 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1450 | 1478 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1431 | 1471 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1478 | 1515 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1442 | 1469 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1422 | 1450 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1412 | 1459 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1463 | 1492 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1438 | 1464 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1450 | 1482 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1425 | 1499 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1453 | 1484 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1462 | 1462 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1436 | 1448 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1411 | 1438 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1275 | 1292 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1331 | 1348 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1288 | 1301 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1261 | 1288 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1246 | 1253 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Document | 1466 | 1465 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 | Meta Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Meta |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | June 30, 2026 | July 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $1.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $4.25 |
| Coding index | 57.7 | 70.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.87 | $0.43 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.7 for Claude Sonnet 5, though on 3 benchmarks against 6. Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for work measured by AA Coding Index or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 5 costs $1.87 and Muse Spark 1.1 $0.43.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?
95 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.