Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra leads Claude Sonnet 4.6 on coding, 63.9 to 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.6 Terra costs 1.3x less per output token ($12.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 109 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra: which to pick
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra for coding: it scores 63.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 109
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
- 14
- GPT-5.6 Terra only
- 20
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra scores 63.9 against 57.3.
5 and 6 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra leads, 42.1 against 30.1.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra leads, 43.2 against 31.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra leads, 90.9% against 85.6%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a AIME result, 92.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads, 87.3% against 86.7%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads, 1284 against 1268.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $0.011, GPT-5.6 Terra $0.0080 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
GPT-5.6 Terra
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $1.68, GPT-5.6 Terra $0.42.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Terra 63.9 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 11.0 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ProofBench: Claude Sonnet 4.6 45.0% against GPT-5.6 Terra 74.0%, 29.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 against GPT-5.6 Terra $12.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1M tokens, GPT-5.6 Terra 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Bars | GPT-5.6 Terra | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 4 | 14 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 6 | 10 | ||
| Reasoning | 4 | 11 | ||
| Math | 1 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 7 | 3 | 1 tie | |
| Web design | 7 | 2 | ||
| General | 16 | 17 | ||
| All shared boards | 45 | 62 | 2 ties |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index414
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 66.6% | 86.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena WebDev | 1523 | 1522 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| AA Coding Index | 63.0 | 76.7 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 82.1% | 85.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 77.4% | 95.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 22.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 55.8% | 74.6% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 39.9% | 47.8% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.5% | 0.5% | Tie |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 57.3% | 77.5% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 49.0% | 58.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| SciCode | 50.1% | 55.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 53.0% | 62.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Terminal-Bench | 53.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| FrontierCode | 24.3% | 41.3% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| WeirdML | 66.1% | 78.3% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1951.4 | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1503 | 1485 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1491 | 1482 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1512 | 1513 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1527 | 1526 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1529 | 1541 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| SciCode | Not measured | 10.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| SWE-Bench Pro V2 | Not measured | 92.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA | 31.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| SWE Atlas: Refactoring | 32.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| SWE Atlas: Test Writing | 31.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 30.1 | 42.1 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.8 | 160.1 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index610
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 31.8 | 43.2 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1190 | 1120 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1213 | 1061 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1211 | 1110 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1196 | 1060 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1226 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1177 | 1083 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1047 | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1104 | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| LiveBench research | 63.6% | 60.4% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LiveBench browser | 68.0% | 84.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LiveBench long agentic | 23.1% | 48.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 9.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 51.0% | 54.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 25.8% | 30.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 38.5% | 41.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 60.2% | 66.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 79.5% | 86.3% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| APEX-Agents | 43.0% | 58.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 9.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| BALROG | Not measured | 53.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 54.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| OSWorld | 72.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $7,204 | $7,343 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| MCP Atlas | 69.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index411
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.6% | 90.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LiveBench reasoning | 86.4% | 90.6% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.6% | 86.5% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.5% | 92.5% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 33.6% | 42.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 87.4% | 93.3% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| ARC-AGI | 86.5% | 96.5% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | 83.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 48.9% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Chess puzzles | 23.0% | 47.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Mystery game puzzles | 16.0% | 35.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1485 | 1469 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1500 | 1496 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1493 | 1465 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1306 | 1295 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1311 | 1312 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 51.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 92.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 85.8% | 99.7% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 86.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 70.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| ProofBench | 45.0% | 74.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: math | 1462 | 1465 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1483 | 1478 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index73
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.3% | 86.7% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.1% | 85.1% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 64.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 65.3% | 65.3% | Tie |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 77.1% | 76.2% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 67.7% | 67.3% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 92.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 35.5% | 43.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: science | 1474 | 1452 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1451 | 1430 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1470 | 1461 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1464 | 1448 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 37.0% | 52.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index72
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1284 | 1268 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1269 | 1256 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1258 | 1229 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1278 | 1240 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1234 | 1134 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1275 | 1240 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1196 | 1219 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1235 | 1178 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LiveBench design | 71.8% | 76.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1617
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 76.1% | 79.3% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 62.5% | 62.4% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 46.6% | 47.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.9% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 60.6% | 65.1% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| IFBench | 56.6% | 71.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.0% | 83.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| DTBench | 89.9% | 93.3% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMCA | 46.5% | 54.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 83.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 54.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| ExploitBench | 23.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1448 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1476 | 1456 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1435 | 1413 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision | 1283 | 1271 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1472 | 1449 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1440 | 1441 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1491 | 1514 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: German | 1428 | 1460 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1420 | 1454 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1410 | 1427 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: French | 1465 | 1466 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1464 | 1451 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1440 | 1452 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1443 | 1446 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1464 | 1453 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1479 | 1454 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1444 | 1431 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1431 | 1418 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1298 | 1272 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1307 | 1337 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1296 | 1278 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1248 | 1236 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1195 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1272 | 1248 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Document | 1482 | 1472 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1207 | 1234 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 | OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | February 17, 2026 | July 9, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $12.00 |
| Coding index | 57.3 | 63.9 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.68 | $0.42 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than GPT-5.6 Terra for coding?
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra for coding: it scores 63.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Terra costs $2.00 and $12.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $1.68 and GPT-5.6 Terra $0.42.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.6 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra comparison based on?
109 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.6 Terra's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.