Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5 leads Claude Opus 4.7 on coding, 83.0 to 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($25.00 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 91 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Claude Opus 4.7 Replace Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
Coding
67.5
Overall
71.6
Output $/M
$25.00
6
Claude Opus 5Anthropic
Coding
83.0
Overall
81.6
Output $/M
$25.00
85
vs boards won of 91 shared

Claude Opus 4.7 or Claude Opus 5: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 5 for coding: it scores 83.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 67.5 for Claude Opus 4.7.

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for work measured by TaxEval (Vals AI) or SAGE (Vals AI), where it leads.

Model AClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic67.5/1004 independent benchmarks$2.95 per solved taskModel BClaude Opus 5Anthropic83.0/1006 independent benchmarks$1.33 per solved task
Shared results
91
Claude Opus 4.7 only
12
Claude Opus 5 only
40
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.7 67.5 from 4 benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 83.0 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 19.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Claude Opus 4.7 54.0% against Claude Opus 5 99.0%, 45.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Both cost $25.00 per million output tokens.
Context window
Both take 1M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.7BarsClaude Opus 5Ties
Coding015
Intelligence02
Agentic work010
Reasoning016
Math06
Knowledge110
General526
All shared boards685
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index015
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured90.8%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena WebDev15581689Claude Opus 5
AA Coding Index73.678.0Claude Opus 5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.1%89.0%Claude Opus 5
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)82.0%97.0%Claude Opus 5
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured53.5%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)71.0%88.4%Claude Opus 5
Code migration (Vals AI)43.9%57.5%Claude Opus 5
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%3.0%Claude Opus 5
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured84.3%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)68.5%84.6%Claude Opus 5
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured60.4%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
SciCodeNot measured56.4%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)54.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench80.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierCode38.5%53.4%Claude Opus 5
FrontierSWENot measured52.0%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
GSO-Bench44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
WeirdML76.4%91.8%Claude Opus 5
MirrorCode31.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured2164.6Only Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: coding15191533Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: software and IT15161527Claude Opus 5
LMArena WebDev: React15601711Claude Opus 5
LMArena WebDev: HTML15541680Claude Opus 5
LMArena WebDev: from an image15771662Claude Opus 5
SciCodeNot measured13.8%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5Leader
AA Intelligence Index40.750.8Claude Opus 5
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8163.9Claude Opus 5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5Leader
AA Agentic Index38.656.5Claude Opus 5
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1266Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1306Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1348Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1254Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1279Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1261Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1265Only Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured88.9%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured84.0%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured62.1%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.5%58.6%Claude Opus 5
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)23.7%45.5%Claude Opus 5
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%55.3%Claude Opus 5
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.7%73.6%Claude Opus 5
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.3%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured27.1%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured47.9%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured18.8%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured9.0%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom88.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
APEX-Agents49.2%65.8%Claude Opus 5
OSWorld 2.018.2%31.4%Claude Opus 5
BALROGNot measured63.4%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
PostTrainBench28.6%35.0%Claude Opus 5
Vending-Bench 2$10,937$11,182Claude Opus 5
LMArena Search12301242Claude Opus 5
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5Leader
GPQA Diamond90.2%93.4%Claude Opus 5
LiveBench reasoningNot measured91.2%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured37.4%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)85.5%89.9%Claude Opus 5
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.4%93.7%Claude Opus 5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.3%54.9%Claude Opus 5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.2%93.9%Claude Opus 5
ARC-AGI93.5%97.5%Claude Opus 5
ARC-AGI-275.8%90.4%Claude Opus 5
SimpleBench61.7%80.6%Claude Opus 5
Chess puzzles41.0%43.0%Claude Opus 5
Mystery game puzzles28.0%59.0%Claude Opus 5
EBR-bench19.0%45.7%Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: hard prompts15061527Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: expert15211554Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15081523Claude Opus 5
LMArena Vision: diagrams13361348Claude Opus 5
LMArena Vision: homework13371338Claude Opus 5
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5Leader
AIME96.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%98.9%Claude Opus 5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 370.2%85.6%Claude Opus 5
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%73.2%Claude Opus 5
ProofBench54.0%99.0%Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: math14981533Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: mathematical work15091544Claude Opus 5
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5Leader
MMLU Pro89.9%91.6%Claude Opus 5
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%87.0%Claude Opus 5
CaseLaw (Vals AI)68.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.1%73.2%Claude Opus 5
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.3%75.1%Claude Opus 4.7
MortgageTax (Vals AI)70.3%72.1%Claude Opus 5
MedCode (Vals AI)54.9%63.6%Claude Opus 5
SimpleQA Verified51.7%59.9%Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: science15081531Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14951525Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: legal and government15041530Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: business and finance14901501Claude Opus 5
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1309Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1349Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1338Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1329Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1335Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1324Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1311Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1352Only Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveBench designNot measured83.0%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index526
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured74.6%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.9%Only Claude Opus 5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)56.1%49.4%Claude Opus 4.7
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%91.0%Claude Opus 5
Vals Multimodal Index67.4%73.9%Claude Opus 5
IFBench58.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.7%82.0%Claude Opus 5
DTBench94.7%97.9%Claude Opus 5
LMCA52.2%64.5%Claude Opus 5
Furniture assembly33.3%60.8%Claude Opus 5
ExploitBench26.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text14901509Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: instruction following14981518Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: creative writing14861493Claude Opus 5
LMArena Vision13171320Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: English14961508Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: non-English14801502Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: Chinese15311573Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: German14951527Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: Japanese14741520Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: Korean14641517Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: French15031519Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: Spanish14941523Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: Russian14941507Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: Polish14891522Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: multi-turn15051500Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: longer queries15051517Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: writing and language14921499Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14741481Claude Opus 5
LMArena Vision: English13221315Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: Chinese13711400Claude Opus 5
LMArena Vision: reading text13271329Claude Opus 5
LMArena Vision: humor13091293Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1278Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing13261313Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Document14951516Claude Opus 5
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.018Fits in one request
Claude Opus 5$0.018Fits in one request

Same cost

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.325Fits in one request
Claude Opus 5$0.325Fits in one request

Same cost

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$1.25Fits in one request
Claude Opus 5$1.25Fits in one request

Same cost

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 5
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic Claude Opus 5
MakerAnthropicAnthropic
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 16, 2026July 24, 2026
Context window1M1M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$5.00
Output $/Mtok$25.00$25.00
Coding index67.583.0
Independent measurements behind it46
Cost per solved task$2.95$1.33
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Claude Opus 5 for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 5 for coding: it scores 83.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 67.5 for Claude Opus 4.7. Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for work measured by TaxEval (Vals AI) or SAGE (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Claude Opus 5?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00 and $25.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Opus 4.7 costs $2.95 and Claude Opus 5 $1.33.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or Claude Opus 5?

Neither: both take 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5 comparison based on?

91 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 4.7's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Claude Opus 5's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-5" title="Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5</a></p>