Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Hy4

Hy4 leads Claude Opus 4.6 on coding, 65.2 to 57.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 costs 20.0x less per output token ($1.2505 vs $25.00 per million). Updated November 5, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.2
Overall
70.4
Output $/M
$25.00
0
Hy4Tencent
Coding
65.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.2505
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

Claude Opus 4.6 or Hy4: which to pick

Pick Hy4 for coding: it scores 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.2 for Claude Opus 4.6, though on 2 benchmarks against 4.

Claude Opus 4.6 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
1
Claude Opus 4.6 only
120
Hy4 only
5
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.6 57.2 from 4 benchmarks, Hy4 65.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 23.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.6 57.6% against Hy4 81.0%, 23.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.6 $25.00 against Hy4 $1.2505 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Hy4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.6BarsHy4Ties
Coding01
All shared boards01
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Hy4Leader
SWE-bench Verified75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual72.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1546Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured39.4%Only Hy4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)57.6%81.0%Hy4
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)48.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench79.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierCode26.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GSO-Bench41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
WeirdML78.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Cybench93.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding1533Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1527Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1539Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1559Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1543Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA33.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring35.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing36.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.076.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ProgramBench0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Hy4Leader
Epoch Capabilities Index156.3Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Hy4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1194Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1216Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1207Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1189Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1143Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1236Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured34.4%Only Hy4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only Hy4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured12.5%Only Hy4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom92.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
APEX-Agents46.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
METR time horizons78.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Remote Labor Index4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench55.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$8,018Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MCP Atlas76.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
τ³-Banking27.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Hy4Leader
GPQA Diamond89.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI94.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-269.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SimpleBench67.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
EBR-bench12.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1525Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: expert1543Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1530Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1340Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Hy4Leader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 366.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math1518Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1525Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MathArena23.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Hy4Leader
MMLU Pro89.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science1518Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1504Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1511Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1497Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite36.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
PRBench Finance53.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
PRBench Legal52.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Hy4Leader
Design Arena: websites1290Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI components1279Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev1277Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data viz1280Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1271Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1287Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1224Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1251Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index36 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Hy4Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.4%Only Hy4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
IFBench53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
DTBench91.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMCA55.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CL-bench20.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Furniture assembly28.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
CL-bench Life17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text1502Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1521Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1504Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision1316Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English1512Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1488Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1551Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: German1502Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1487Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1463Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1512Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1509Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1495Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1498Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1512Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1518Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1502Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1492Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: English1324Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1370Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1326Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1314Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1274Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1331Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1507Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
MultiChallenge56.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
EQ-Bench 41210Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Hy4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.018Fits in one request
Hy4$0.0010Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$0.325Fits in one request
Hy4$0.025Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.6$1.25Fits in one request
Hy4$0.096Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.6 and Hy4
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.6Tencent Hy4
MakerAnthropicTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 4, 2026November 4, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.417
Output $/Mtok$25.00$1.2505
Coding index57.265.2
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved task$1.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Hy4 for coding?

Pick Hy4 for coding: it scores 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.2 for Claude Opus 4.6, though on 2 benchmarks against 4. Claude Opus 4.6 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Hy4?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 costs $0.417 and $1.2505. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or Hy4?

Hy4, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Hy4 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 5, 2026. Claude Opus 4.6's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Hy4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-tencent-hy4" title="Claude Opus 4.6 vs Hy4, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-6-vs-tencent-hy4">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.6 vs Hy4</a></p>