Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.4 to 11.2, and Claude Haiku 5.5 costs 2.4x less per output token ($0.50 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
70.7
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.50
1
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
1
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
64
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking only
29
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 70.7 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 32.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Claude Haiku 5.5 43.4 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 11.2, 32.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking $1.20 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1586Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured17.4Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1392Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1393Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena WebDev: React1605Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1569Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-Bench Pro V287.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index43.411.2Claude Haiku 5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1371Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1376Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1384Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProofBench89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1399Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1390Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified23.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1384Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1392Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1364Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1360Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Design Arena: websites1262Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1283Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1315Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1297Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1342Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1278Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
DTBench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMCA51.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1368Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1344Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1314Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1392Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1342Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1407Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1356Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1280Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1310Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1351Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1358Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1337Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1345Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1346Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1353Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1330Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1312Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
MultiChallenge67.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.011Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.042Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026September 11, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.50$1.20
Coding index70.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Claude Haiku 5.5, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next