Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.4 to 17.7, and Claude Haiku 5.5 costs 4.2x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.08 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
70.7
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.50
10
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.08
0
vs boards won of 10 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
10
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
55
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
41
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 70.7 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 31.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Claude Haiku 5.5 1605 against Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 1353, 41.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Qwen3.5-122B-A10B $2.08 per million output tokens, 4.2x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsQwen3.5-122B-A10BTies
Coding40
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General30
All shared boards100
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev15861361Claude Haiku 5.5
AA Coding IndexNot measured43.3Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode55.0%39.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.1%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1436Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1436Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena WebDev: React16051353Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML15691351Claude Haiku 5.5
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-Bench Pro V287.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
AA Intelligence Index43.417.7Claude Haiku 5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.6%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.7%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%25.2%Claude Haiku 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%17.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1421Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1431Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1431Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1249Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1261Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProofBench89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1431Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1431Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified23.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1432Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1423Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1422Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1414Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
Design Arena: websites1262Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1283Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1315Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1297Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1342Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1278Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured75.7%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%76.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
DTBench95.0%84.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMCA51.1%32.2%Claude Haiku 5.5
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1417Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1399Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1368Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1244Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1428Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1401Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1463Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1425Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1367Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1353Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1443Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1425Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1398Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1416Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1410Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1387Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1366Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1249Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1301Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1251Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1243Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
MultiChallenge67.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.0013Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.019Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.073Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026February 25, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.26
Output $/Mtok$0.50$2.08
Coding index70.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.26 and $2.08. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Claude Haiku 5.5, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next