Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Claude Haiku 5.5 leads Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.4 to 6.7, and Claude Haiku 5.5 costs 2.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
70.7
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.50
3
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
3
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
60
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
32
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 70.7 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 43.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Epoch Capabilities Index: Claude Haiku 5.5 159.3 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 119.5, 49.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTies
Intelligence20
Reasoning10
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured16.4%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured47.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1586Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1276Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1261Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena WebDev: React1605Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1569Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index43.46.7Claude Haiku 5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3119.5Claude Haiku 5.5
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured41.7%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%3.5%Claude Haiku 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1251Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1221Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1269Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProofBench89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GSM8KNot measured93.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1251Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1243Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured63.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified23.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MMLUNot measured79.1%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured70.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1221Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1187Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1257Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1224Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1263Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1291Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1314Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1295Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1343Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1278Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
DTBench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMCA51.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
HellaSwagNot measured83.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured80.8%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena TextNot measured1230Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1223Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1174Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1248Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1205Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1222Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1228Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1222Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1251Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1191Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1150Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026November 11, 2024
Context window1M33K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.66
Output $/Mtok$0.50$1.00
Coding index70.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Claude Haiku 5.5, with 1M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next