Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Moondream 3 Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
70.7
Overall
43.4
Output $/M
$0.50
M Moondream 3 PreviewMoondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $0.50 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 is 5.0x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3 Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Claude Haiku 5.5 has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); Moondream 3 Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 70.7 from 5 benchmarks, Moondream 3 Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Moondream 3 Preview $2.50 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Moondream 3 Preview 32K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1586Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1605Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1569Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index43.4Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProofBench89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified23.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1263Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1291Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1315Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1293Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1343Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1279Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
DTBench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMCA51.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.0015Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.022Exceeds the context window

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.085Exceeds the context window

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5Moondream 3 Preview
MakerAnthropicMoondream
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1M32K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.50$2.50
Coding index70.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Moondream 3 Preview for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3 Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Moondream 3 Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Moondream 3 Preview costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Moondream 3 Preview?

Claude Haiku 5.5, with 1M tokens against 32K.

Has any benchmark tested both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Moondream 3 Preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Claude Haiku 5.5 has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); Moondream 3 Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next