LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Updated October 21, 2026. 42 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
75.9
Overall
43.4
Output $/M
$0.50
18
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
79.7
Overall
48.1
Output $/M
$4.25
22
vs boards won of 42 shared, 2 tied

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 75.9 for Claude Haiku 5.5.

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 when output tokens cost 8.5x less, or when what matters is LiveBench coding or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
42
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
20
Muse Spark 1.3 only
50
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 75.9 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 79.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 8.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Claude Haiku 5.5 89.0% against Muse Spark 1.3 58.0%, 31.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 8.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding84
Intelligence11
Agentic work441 tie
Reasoning22
Math211 tie
Web design16
General04
All shared boards18222 ties
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index84
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench coding91.4%90.2%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena WebDev15861659Muse Spark 1.3
AA Coding IndexNot measured75.8Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%10.6%Claude Haiku 5.5
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%82.9%Claude Haiku 5.5
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%27.6%Claude Haiku 5.5
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%0.5%Claude Haiku 5.5
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%43.9%Claude Haiku 5.5
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%69.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
SciCode55.0%59.7%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%25.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1510Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16051672Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: HTML15691653Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index43.448.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3157.2Claude Haiku 5.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index44
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1217Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1244Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1048Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench research81.9%68.6%Claude Haiku 5.5
LiveBench browser80.0%80.0%Tie
LiveBench long agentic57.6%40.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%58.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%36.0%Muse Spark 1.3
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%40.9%Claude Haiku 5.5
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%62.7%Muse Spark 1.3
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%4.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%58.6%Muse Spark 1.3
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench reasoning82.4%89.7%Muse Spark 1.3
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.1%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%37.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
Mystery game puzzles30.0%25.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1503Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1519Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1500Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%99.2%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%74.4%Claude Haiku 5.5
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%46.3%Tie
ProofBench89.0%58.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1497Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified23.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1507Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1493Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websites12631356Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components12951352Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev13151329Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz12921343Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D13431359Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories12791353Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1300Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1280Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench design83.1%74.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%79.6%Muse Spark 1.3
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench95.0%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA51.1%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1479Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1495Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1513Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1511Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1496Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1491Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1487Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1488Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1457Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5Meta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerAnthropicMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026September 2, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.50$4.25
Coding index75.979.7
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 75.9 for Claude Haiku 5.5. Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 when output tokens cost 8.5x less, or when what matters is LiveBench coding or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3" title="Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3</a></p>