Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Schematron V2 Turbo

Schematron V2 Turbo costs 3.3x less per output token than Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.15 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
70.7
Overall
67.1
Output $/M
$0.50
Schematron V2 TurboInference.net
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
vs $0.50 vs $0.15 per 1M output tokens. Schematron V2 Turbo is 3.3x cheaper.

Claude Haiku 5.5 or Schematron V2 Turbo: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Schematron V2 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Schematron V2 Turbo for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.15 vs $0.50 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Claude Haiku 5.5 has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); Schematron V2 Turbo has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 70.7 from 5 benchmarks, Schematron V2 Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Schematron V2 Turbo $0.15 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Schematron V2 Turbo 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index19 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Schematron V2 TurboLeader
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1585Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1450Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1446Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1606Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1565Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-Bench Pro V287.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Schematron V2 TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index43.4Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Schematron V2 TurboLeader
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Schematron V2 TurboLeader
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1421Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1448Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1429Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Schematron V2 TurboLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProofBench89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1413Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1431Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Schematron V2 TurboLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified23.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1408Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1372Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1395Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1406Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Schematron V2 TurboLeader
Design Arena: websites1262Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1282Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1315Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1293Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1342Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1277Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards measured
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Schematron V2 TurboLeader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
DTBench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMCA51.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text1401Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1416Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1336Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1409Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1386Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1431Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1441Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1385Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1373Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1396Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1399Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1370Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1352Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MultiChallenge67.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Schematron V2 Turbo$0.0001Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Schematron V2 Turbo$0.0019Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Schematron V2 Turbo$0.0075Exceeds the context window

Schematron V2 Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5Inference.net Schematron V2 Turbo
MakerAnthropicInference.net
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026September 12, 2026
Context window1M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.03
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.15
Coding index70.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Schematron V2 Turbo for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Schematron V2 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Schematron V2 Turbo for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.15 vs $0.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Schematron V2 Turbo?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Schematron V2 Turbo costs $0.03 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Schematron V2 Turbo?

Claude Haiku 5.5, with 1M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Schematron V2 Turbo?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Claude Haiku 5.5 has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); Schematron V2 Turbo has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next