LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

Updated October 21, 2026. 6 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
75.9
Overall
43.4
Output $/M
$0.50
6
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
3.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 6 shared

Decision reading

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores 75.9 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 when output tokens cost 1.2x less, or when the context window is larger, 1M against 128K tokens.

Shared results
6
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
56
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
40
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 75.9 from 2 benchmarks, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 83.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Claude Haiku 5.5 98.9% against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 6.9%, 91.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Ties
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge10
All shared boards60
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index19 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured3.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1586Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
WeirdMLNot measured11.8%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1290Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1291Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena WebDev: React1605Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1569Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Intelligence Index43.4Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BALROGNot measured17.4%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%37.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured10.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzles55.0%3.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
Mystery game puzzles30.0%12.0%Claude Haiku 5.5
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
VPCTNot measured34.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1267Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1234Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1278Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%6.9%Claude Haiku 5.5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%0.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProofBench89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MATH level 5Not measured52.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1267Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1271Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified23.8%8.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
MMLUNot measured76.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1286Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1282Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1305Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1265Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Design Arena: websites1263Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1295Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1315Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1292Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1343Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1279Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
DTBench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMCA51.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured67.2%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1286Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1258Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1268Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1066Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1301Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1266Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1265Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1272Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1216Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1195Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1297Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1276Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1275Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1244Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1285Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1289Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1282Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1253Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1072Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1033Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5OpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026July 18, 2024
Context window1M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.60
Coding index75.93.6
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores 75.9 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 when output tokens cost 1.2x less, or when the context window is larger, 1M against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

Claude Haiku 5.5, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next