Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs 20.0x less per output token than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
70.7
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.50
3
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
3
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
60
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 only
12
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 70.7 from 5 benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 14.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Claude Haiku 5.5 44.4% against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 19.9%, 24.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 $10.00 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Ties
Coding10
Reasoning20
All shared boards30
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured83.1%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LiveBench coding91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1586Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured3.9%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1605Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1569Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode9.2%7.7%Claude Haiku 5.5
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Leader
AA Intelligence Index43.4Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index159.3Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Leader
LiveBench research81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic57.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
METR time horizonsNot measured55.4%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Remote Labor IndexNot measured0.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured42.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,602Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Leader
LiveBench reasoning82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%19.9%Claude Haiku 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%84.8%Claude Haiku 5.5
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured62.4%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Chess puzzles55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
EBR-bench43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
VPCTNot measured46.4%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProofBench89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.8%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
SimpleQA Verified23.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Leader
Design Arena: websites1262Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1283Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1315Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1294Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1342Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1277Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench design83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Leader
Vals Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis53.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
DTBench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMCA51.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured91.7%Only Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 measured
Furniture assembly47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.0063Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.092Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05$0.350Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5Google Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
MakerAnthropicGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026June 5, 2025
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.50$10.00
Coding index70.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 5.5 has a coding score, 70.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next