LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Muse Wonder

Updated October 21, 2026. 43 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
49.8
Overall
16.9
Output $/M
$5.00
0
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
64.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
43
vs boards won of 43 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 64.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.8 for Claude Haiku 4.5, though on 1 benchmark against 3.

Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when output tokens cost 4.0x less.

Shared results
43
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
51
Muse Wonder only
17
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 4.5 49.8 from 3 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 64.5 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 41.3 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Haiku 4.5 11.4% against Muse Wonder 83.1%, 71.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Muse Wonder 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5BarsMuse WonderTies
Coding07
Intelligence01
Agentic work05
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design06
General015
All shared boards043
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Muse WonderLeader
SWE-bench Verified66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding48.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev13301652Muse Wonder
AA Coding Index43.9Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured49.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.4%83.1%Muse Wonder
Code migration (Vals AI)7.5%62.5%Muse Wonder
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured66.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Wonder measured
SciCodeNot measured60.3%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdML45.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14541522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT14391515Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React13261641Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: HTML13181694Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Muse WonderLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.9Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index142.2161.8Muse Wonder
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Muse WonderLeader
AA Agentic Index8.0Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1236Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveBench research42.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic11.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)31.0%56.6%Muse Wonder
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.9%36.3%Muse Wonder
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%50.5%Muse Wonder
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured23.8%Only Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)22.7%67.1%Muse Wonder
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured22.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured39.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
BALROG31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$459$9,432Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Muse WonderLeader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured27.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)46.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured50.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14211506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert14431513Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351506Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Muse WonderLeader
AIME82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProofBenchNot measured84.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
MATH level 596.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math13981486Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work14301514Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Muse WonderLeader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14061506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13941512Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government14001505Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14001483Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Muse WonderLeader
Design Arena: websites11221361Muse Wonder
Design Arena: UI components11001371Muse Wonder
Design Arena: game dev10971380Muse Wonder
Design Arena: data viz11241330Muse Wonder
Design Arena: 3D10721425Muse Wonder
Design Arena: all code categories11151370Muse Wonder
Design Arena: SVG1025Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1139Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench design59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index015
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Muse WonderLeader
Vals IndexNot measured64.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveBench data analysis59.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)54.3%70.2%Muse Wonder
SAGE (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index42.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.7%Only Muse Wonder measured
DTBench73.6%95.2%Muse Wonder
LMCA30.9%56.8%Muse Wonder
ExploitBench13.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text13971502Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14141491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing13711491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: English14141507Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English13771492Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese14181537Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: German1374Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1338Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1346Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French14111523Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Spanish1421Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13811522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Polish1343Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14091510Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14271493Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language13861496Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13691482Muse Wonder
LMArena Document1420Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Muse WonderLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window
Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Muse Wonder
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Meta Muse Wonder
MakerAnthropicMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025October 12, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$4.00
Output $/Mtok$5.00$20.00
Coding index49.864.5
Independent measurements behind it31
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 64.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.8 for Claude Haiku 4.5, though on 1 benchmark against 3. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when output tokens cost 4.0x less.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Muse Wonder?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next