Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview on coding, 35.6 to 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs 3.3x less per output token ($1.50 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 65 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview: which to pick
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for coding: it scores 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview.
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $5.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $0.56).
- Shared results
- 65
- Claude Haiku 4.5 only
- 30
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
- 14
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 35.6 against 22.7.
4 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads, 16.9 against 15.6.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads, 8.0 against 1.6.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads, 81.1% against 72.2%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads, 83.3% against 82.7%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads, 86.2% against 78.7%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads, 1122 against 1082.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Claude Haiku 4.5 $0.0035, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Claude Haiku 4.5 $0.56, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $0.18.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 12.1 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Claude Haiku 4.5 41.2% against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 80.1%, 39.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Bars | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 10 | 1 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 5 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 2 | ||
| Math | 1 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 3 | 8 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 2 | ||
| General | 6 | 14 | ||
| All shared boards | 35 | 29 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index101
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 66.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench coding | 48.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1257 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| AA Coding Index | 43.9 | 34.7 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 41.2% | 80.1% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 66.6% | 62.8% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 11.4% | 0.0% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 7.5% | 4.6% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.0% | Tie |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 43.8% | 34.1% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 797.7 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1454 | 1400 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1439 | 1413 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1326 | 1245 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1318 | 1276 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1336 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 4.6% | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 16.9 | 15.6 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.2 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 8.0 | 1.6 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LiveBench research | 42.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 40.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 11.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 31.0% | 30.0% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 5.9% | 3.1% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 10.6% | 3.4% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 22.7% | 8.6% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| BALROG | 31.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $459 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 68.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 72.2% | 81.1% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LiveBench reasoning | 61.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 46.1% | 82.5% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 71.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 47.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 8.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1421 | 1407 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1443 | 1398 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1435 | 1403 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1242 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1271 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 82.7% | 83.3% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 92.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 66.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MATH level 5 | 96.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1398 | 1428 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1430 | 1417 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index38
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 78.7% | 86.2% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 81.2% | 83.8% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 56.5% | 55.0% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 60.6% | 59.4% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 67.5% | 71.8% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 62.2% | 68.0% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 79.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 32.7% | 47.6% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1406 | 1425 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1394 | 1428 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1400 | 1418 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1400 | 1389 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 51.4% | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index62
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1122 | 1082 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1097 | 1069 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1096 | 1029 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1124 | 1045 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1071 | 1047 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1114 | 1071 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1025 | 1051 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1140 | 1167 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LiveBench design | 59.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index614
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 59.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 54.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 31.8% | 49.5% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 85.2% | 63.9% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 42.9% | 41.4% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| DTBench | 73.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMCA | 30.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1416 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1414 | 1377 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1371 | 1401 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1240 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1414 | 1414 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1377 | 1410 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1418 | 1460 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: German | 1374 | 1430 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1338 | 1413 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1346 | 1392 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: French | 1411 | 1424 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1421 | 1421 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1381 | 1420 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1343 | 1443 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1409 | 1417 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1427 | 1394 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1386 | 1408 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1369 | 1386 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1232 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1278 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1246 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1266 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1259 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1308 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1248 | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 | Google Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | October 15, 2025 | March 3, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.00 | $0.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $5.00 | $1.50 |
| Coding index | 35.6 | 22.7 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.56 | $0.18 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for coding?
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for coding: it scores 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $5.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $0.56).
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 and $1.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $0.56 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $0.18.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview comparison based on?
65 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.