Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax M1

Claude Fable 5 leads MiniMax M1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 49.6 to 11.7, and MiniMax M1 costs 22.7x less per output token ($2.20 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Fable 5Anthropic
Coding
79.3
Overall
79.0
Output $/M
$50.00
29
MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
0
vs boards won of 29 shared

Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax M1: which to pick

Only Claude Fable 5 has a coding score, 79.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for output tokens 22.7x cheaper ($2.20 vs $50.00 per million).

Shared results
29
Claude Fable 5 only
98
MiniMax M1 only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Fable 5 79.3 from 6 benchmarks, MiniMax M1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 37.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Japanese: Claude Fable 5 1504 against MiniMax M1 1217, 47.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Fable 5 $50.00 against MiniMax M1 $2.20 per million output tokens, 22.7x apart.
Context window
Both take 1M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Fable 5BarsMiniMax M1Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards290
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M1Leader
LiveBench coding98.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena WebDev1624Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
AA Coding Index76.5Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)89.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)41.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)55.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SciCode61.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
FrontierCode53.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
FrontierSWE47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
GSO-Bench78.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
WeirdML91.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MirrorCode63.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ALE-Bench2041.3Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: coding15181359Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: software and IT15131359Claude Fable 5
LMArena WebDev: React1631Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1651Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1623Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M1Leader
AA Intelligence Index49.611.7Claude Fable 5
Epoch Capabilities Index163.4Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M1Leader
AA Agentic Index50.7Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1261Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1280Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1263Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1284Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1292Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1285Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1227Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1272Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LiveBench research86.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LiveBench long agentic53.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)38.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)15.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
APEX-Agents63.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Remote Labor Index16.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
PostTrainBench41.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,680Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Search1229Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M1Leader
GPQA Diamond93.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)89.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)55.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)85.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ARC-AGI-289.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SimpleBench81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Chess puzzles47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Mystery game puzzles52.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
EBR-bench39.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15071339Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: expert15341317Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15091353Claude Fable 5
LMArena Vision: diagrams1357Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1361Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M1Leader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 387.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 490.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ProofBench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: math15161361Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: mathematical work15151363Claude Fable 5
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M1Leader
MMLU Pro91.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)71.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SimpleQA Verified70.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: science15061354Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14801355Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: legal and government14981337Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: business and finance14801319Claude Fable 5
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M1Leader
Design Arena: websites1295Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1316Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1335Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1305Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1318Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1310Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1301Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1329Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LiveBench design84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M1Leader
LiveBench data analysis80.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)51.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)88.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index74.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
IFBench63.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
DTBench98.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMCA61.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Furniture assembly35.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text14911343Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: instruction following15021312Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: creative writing14941297Claude Fable 5
LMArena Vision1325Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: English14981363Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: non-English14821319Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: Chinese15431360Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: German14861350Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: Japanese15041217Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: Korean14871266Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: French15051370Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: Spanish14981353Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: Russian15031329Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: Polish14941329Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: multi-turn15041335Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: longer queries15101326Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: writing and language15011311Claude Fable 5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14821303Claude Fable 5
LMArena Vision: English1323Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1373Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1337Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1341Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1338Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Document1496Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5MiniMax M1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Fable 5$0.035Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Fable 5$0.650Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Fable 5$2.50Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Fable 5 and MiniMax M1
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Fable 5MiniMax M1
MakerAnthropicMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 9, 2026June 17, 2025
Context window1M1M
Input $/Mtok$10.00$0.40
Output $/Mtok$50.00$2.20
Coding index79.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$2.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than MiniMax M1 for coding?

Only Claude Fable 5 has a coding score, 79.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for output tokens 22.7x cheaper ($2.20 vs $50.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax M1?

Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 and $2.20. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Fable 5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5 or MiniMax M1?

Neither: both take 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax M1 comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Fable 5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next