Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B
Claude Fable 5 leads Gemma 4 26B A4B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 49.6 to 16.7, and Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 83.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 52 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Fable 5 or Gemma 4 26B A4B: which to pick
Only Claude Fable 5 has a coding score, 79.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 83.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $50.00 per million) and work measured by IFBench, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 52
- Claude Fable 5 only
- 75
- Gemma 4 26B A4B only
- 3
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 leads, 49.6 against 16.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 leads, 50.7 against 2.9.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 93.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a MMLU Pro result, 91.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1295.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 takes 1M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Claude Fable 5 $0.035, Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has the number, $2.16.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5 79.3 from 6 benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B A4B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 51.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- WeirdML: Claude Fable 5 91.9% against Gemma 4 26B A4B 35.2%, 56.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5 $50.00 against Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.60 per million output tokens, 83.3x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Fable 5 takes 1M tokens, Gemma 4 26B A4B 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5 | Bars | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 10 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 8 | 0 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| General | 22 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 51 | 1 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index100
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 98.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1624 | 1360 | Claude Fable 5 |
| AA Coding Index | 76.5 | 39.3 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 89.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 95.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 41.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 90.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 55.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 2.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 80.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| SciCode | 61.0% | 40.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 62.9% | 25.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| FrontierCode | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 47.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 78.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| WeirdML | 91.9% | 35.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| MirrorCode | 63.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2041.3 | 927.2 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1518 | 1446 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1513 | 1454 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1631 | 1351 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1651 | 1362 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1623 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 49.6 | 16.7 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 163.4 | 141.9 | Claude Fable 5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 50.7 | 2.9 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1261 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1280 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1264 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1284 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1292 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1285 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1227 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1270 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench research | 86.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 92.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 53.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 56.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 38.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 49.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 73.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 15.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 98.5% | 43.6% | Claude Fable 5 |
| APEX-Agents | 63.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 16.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| PostTrainBench | 41.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,680 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Search | 1229 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 89.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 89.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.6% | 79.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 55.5% | 19.3% | Claude Fable 5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 85.9% | 73.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| SimpleBench | 81.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 47.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 52.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| EBR-bench | 39.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1507 | 1438 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1534 | 1447 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1509 | 1448 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1357 | 1264 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1361 | 1293 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 82.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 87.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 90.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| ProofBench | 95.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1516 | 1470 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1515 | 1475 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 91.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 88.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 71.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 76.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 56.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1506 | 1446 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1480 | 1428 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1498 | 1457 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1480 | 1429 | Claude Fable 5 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 42.7% | Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1295 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1316 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1335 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1304 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1318 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1310 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1302 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1329 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench design | 84.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index221
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 80.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 70.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 51.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 88.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 74.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| IFBench | 63.5% | 72.4% | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.3% | 65.7% | Claude Fable 5 |
| DTBench | 98.4% | 74.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMCA | 61.2% | 29.7% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 95.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 35.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1434 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1502 | 1420 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1494 | 1400 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision | 1325 | 1260 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1498 | 1444 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1482 | 1421 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1543 | 1495 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1486 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1504 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1487 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1505 | 1460 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1498 | 1415 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1503 | 1434 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1494 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1504 | 1441 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1510 | 1427 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1501 | 1405 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1482 | 1403 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1323 | 1256 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1373 | 1312 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1337 | 1268 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1341 | 1272 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1297 | Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1191 | Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1338 | 1256 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Document | 1496 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5 | Google Gemma 4 26B A4B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | June 9, 2026 | April 3, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $10.00 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $50.00 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | 79.3 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $2.16 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than Gemma 4 26B A4B for coding?
Only Claude Fable 5 has a coding score, 79.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 4 26B A4B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for output tokens 83.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $50.00 per million) and work measured by IFBench, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Gemma 4 26B A4B?
Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Fable 5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Gemma 4 26B A4B?
Claude Fable 5, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B comparison based on?
52 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Fable 5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Gemma 4 26B A4B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.