Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Claude Fable 5 leads DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on coding, 79.3 to 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 59.5x less per output token ($0.84 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 92 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: which to pick
Pick Claude Fable 5 for coding: it scores 79.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 62.5 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for output tokens 59.5x cheaper ($0.84 vs $50.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).
- Shared results
- 92
- Claude Fable 5 only
- 35
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
- 9
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 scores 79.3 against 62.5.
6 and 5 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 leads, 49.6 against 24.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a AA Agentic Index result, 50.7.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 93.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has a MMLU Pro result, 91.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads, 1308 against 1295.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Claude Fable 5 $0.035, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.0006 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Fable 5 has the number, $2.16.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5 79.3 from 6 benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 22.9 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tier 4: Claude Fable 5 90.2% against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 26.8%, 63.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5 $50.00 against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.84 per million output tokens, 59.5x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Fable 5 takes 1M tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5 | Bars | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 15 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 9 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 10 | 2 | ||
| Math | 6 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 6 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 3 | ||
| General | 31 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 85 | 7 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index150
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 98.3% | 90.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1624 | 1618 | Claude Fable 5 |
| AA Coding Index | 76.5 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 89.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 95.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 41.4% | 19.7% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 90.3% | 84.7% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 55.1% | 45.6% | Claude Fable 5 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 2.0% | 0.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.3% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 80.5% | 74.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 46.5% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 16.4% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.8% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.7% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| SciCode | 61.0% | 51.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| FrontierCode | 53.5% | 43.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| FrontierSWE | 47.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 78.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| WeirdML | 91.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MirrorCode | 63.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2041.3 | 1092.3 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1518 | 1502 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1513 | 1496 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1631 | 1628 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1651 | 1612 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1623 | 1606 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 49.6 | 24.7 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 163.4 | 155.9 | Claude Fable 5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 50.7 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1261 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1280 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1264 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1284 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1292 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1285 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1227 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1270 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench research | 86.9% | 86.8% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LiveBench browser | 92.0% | 84.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LiveBench long agentic | 53.2% | 40.1% | Claude Fable 5 |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.8% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 56.3% | 53.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 38.3% | 26.6% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 49.5% | 41.4% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 73.7% | 57.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.8% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 15.7% | 0.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 29.6% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 63.6% | 39.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Remote Labor Index | 16.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| PostTrainBench | 41.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,680 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Search | 1229 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index102
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 89.7% | 86.7% | Claude Fable 5 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 21.2% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 89.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 55.5% | 39.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 85.9% | 89.8% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | 94.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | 72.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| SimpleBench | 81.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 47.0% | 48.0% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Mystery game puzzles | 52.0% | 43.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| EBR-bench | 39.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1507 | 1483 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1534 | 1501 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1509 | 1488 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1357 | 1297 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1361 | 1307 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 98.3% | Claude Fable 5 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 87.0% | 67.4% | Claude Fable 5 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 90.2% | 26.8% | Claude Fable 5 |
| ProofBench | 95.0% | 54.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1516 | 1478 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1515 | 1485 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 91.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 88.6% | 83.3% | Claude Fable 5 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 71.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 76.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 56.1% | 41.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.7% | 42.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1506 | 1469 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1480 | 1484 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1498 | 1443 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1480 | 1461 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index63
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1295 | 1308 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1316 | 1312 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1335 | 1330 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1304 | 1291 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1318 | 1355 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1310 | 1320 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1302 | 1245 | Claude Fable 5 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1329 | 1265 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LiveBench design | 84.7% | 79.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index311
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 80.5% | 79.3% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 70.4% | 64.3% | Claude Fable 5 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 51.9% | 47.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 88.5% | 85.5% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 74.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| IFBench | 63.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.3% | 84.0% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
| DTBench | 98.4% | 89.9% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMCA | 61.2% | 47.0% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 95.0% | 46.3% | Claude Fable 5 |
| Furniture assembly | 35.8% | 34.2% | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1464 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1502 | 1473 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1494 | 1437 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision | 1325 | 1278 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1498 | 1473 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1482 | 1449 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1543 | 1501 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1486 | 1470 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1504 | 1432 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1487 | 1436 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1505 | 1465 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1498 | 1459 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1503 | 1467 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1494 | 1457 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1504 | 1461 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1510 | 1473 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1501 | 1450 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1482 | 1445 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1323 | 1288 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1373 | 1327 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1337 | 1282 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1341 | 1260 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1338 | 1275 | Claude Fable 5 |
| LMArena Document | 1496 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | June 9, 2026 | September 10, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $10.00 | $0.2225 |
| Output $/Mtok | $50.00 | $0.84 |
| Coding index | 79.3 | 62.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | $2.16 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding?
Pick Claude Fable 5 for coding: it scores 79.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 62.5 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for output tokens 59.5x cheaper ($0.84 vs $50.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.2225 and $0.84. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Fable 5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparison based on?
92 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Fable 5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.