Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Fable 5.2 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro on coding, 87.8 to 19.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 2.5 Pro costs 4.0x less per output token ($10.00 vs $40.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.
vs boards won of 25 shared
Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemini 2.5 Pro: which to pick
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 19.2 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $40.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).
Model AClaude Fable 5.2Anthropic87.8/1004 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BGemini 2.5 ProGoogle19.2/1003 independent benchmarks$0.64 per solved task
- Shared results
- 25
- Claude Fable 5.2 only
- 43
- Gemini 2.5 Pro only
- 69
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 scores 87.8 against 19.2.
4 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 64.6.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.6.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 leads, 1351 against 1159.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a Vals Index result, 71.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Fable 5.2 $0.028, Gemini 2.5 Pro $0.0063 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has the number, $0.64.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5.2 87.8 from 4 benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro 19.2 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 64.8 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tier 4: Claude Fable 5.2 100.0% against Gemini 2.5 Pro 0.0%, 100.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5.2 $40.00 against Gemini 2.5 Pro $10.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.2 | Bars | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 4 | 0 | ||
| Math | 4 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 2 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 5 | 0 | ||
| General | 4 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 25 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 53.6% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LiveBench coding | 79.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1838 | 1228 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 33.3 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 54.4% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 65.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 93.8% | 0.4% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 19.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 80.1% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| SciCode | 67.7% | 46.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 26.5% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.6% | 0.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 49.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 32.6% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| FrontierSWE | 69.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 3.9% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 54.0% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2509.8 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1451 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1459 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1915 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1738 | 1236 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1285 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| GameBench 2 | 99.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Not measured | 32.6% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 64.6 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 173.4 | 144.9 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 1.6 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1402 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1325 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1434 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench research | 94.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 86.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 82.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 32.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 46.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 5.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 83.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 55.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 63.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 54.1% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| APEX-Agents | 80.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 41.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GDPval | Not measured | 23.3% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | Not measured | 41.5% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| SpireClimb | 15.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $574 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Search | Not measured | 1143 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | Not measured | 29.5% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| τ³-Banking | Not measured | 13.7% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 88.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 84.4% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 74.3% | 22.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | 76.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 93.9% | 85.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | 41.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.8% | 4.9% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| SimpleBench | 94.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 79.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 90.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| EBR-bench | 90.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1455 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1452 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1452 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1273 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1282 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 70.3% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run) | 72.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GoBench | 2566 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 87.7% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 99.7% | 84.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 95.1% | 24.6% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1450 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1455 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| MathArena | 82.8% | 13.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.9% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.8% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.9% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.6% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 86.2% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| AA-Omniscience | 66.8 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 94.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1481 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1476 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1480 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1440 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| PRBench Finance | 47.1% | 38.9% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| PRBench Legal | 49.0% | 41.4% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1351 | 1159 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1371 | 1130 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1396 | 1101 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1219 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1517 | 1060 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1373 | 1142 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LiveBench design | 85.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 71.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 81.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.5% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 48.7% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.3% | 69.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| GDPval-AA | 1831 | 463 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| DTBench | 99.2% | 82.4% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMCA | 70.6% | 34.8% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Furniture assembly | 90.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1458 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1437 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1454 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1263 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1458 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1452 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1507 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1487 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1461 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1434 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1474 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1474 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1461 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1479 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1452 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1449 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1454 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1441 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1261 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1300 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1270 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1262 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1304 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1284 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1265 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1423 | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| MultiChallenge | Not measured | 53.6% | Only Gemini 2.5 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$0.028Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.0063Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$0.520Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.092Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$2.00Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.350Fits in one request
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5.2 | Google Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 9, 2026 | June 17, 2025 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $8.00 | $1.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $40.00 | $10.00 |
| Coding index | 87.8 | 19.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.64 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5.2 better than Gemini 2.5 Pro for coding?
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 19.2 for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $40.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per million input tokens and $40.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 2.5 Pro only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro comparison based on?
25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Fable 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Gemini 2.5 Pro's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.