Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Claude Fable 5.1 leads Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 53.4 to 12.7, and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 14.3x less per output token ($3.50 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 43 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
Coding
84.2
Overall
84.7
Output $/M
$50.00
43
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
0
vs boards won of 43 shared

Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Only Claude Fable 5.1 has a coding score, 84.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for output tokens 14.3x cheaper ($3.50 vs $50.00 per million).

Shared results
43
Claude Fable 5.1 only
90
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
3
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Fable 5.1 84.2 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 45.3 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Claude Fable 5.1 81.6 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 22.1, 59.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Fable 5.1 $50.00 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 14.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Fable 5.1 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Fable 5.1BarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Coding40
Intelligence10
Agentic work20
Reasoning40
Math30
Knowledge50
Web design60
General180
All shared boards430
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
LiveBench coding97.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena WebDev1743Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
AA Coding Index81.622.1Claude Fable 5.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)58.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)54.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)7.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
IOI (Vals AI)90.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)85.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)61.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)28.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)61.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SciCode63.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
FrontierCode50.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
FrontierSWE56.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
GSO-Bench88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
WeirdML92.9%41.0%Claude Fable 5.1
MirrorCode73.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
ALE-Bench2143.2Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding15321424Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: software and IT15301431Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena WebDev: React1792Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1684Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1722Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SWE-Bench Pro V299.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring56.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index53.412.7Claude Fable 5.1
Epoch Capabilities Index166.5Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index57.91.3Claude Fable 5.1
Design Arena: agents building web apps1318Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1326Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1267Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1327Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1307Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1394Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LiveBench research82.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LiveBench browser100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LiveBench long agentic80.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)22.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)49.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)55.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)76.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)63.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)5.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
APEX-Agents68.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Remote Labor Index17.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SpireClimb2.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,422-$11Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Search1246Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
MCP Atlas87.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond93.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LiveBench reasoning91.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)47.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)90.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)59.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured80.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
ARC-AGI97.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
ARC-AGI-290.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Mystery game puzzles58.0%9.0%Claude Fable 5.1
EBR-bench57.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15281416Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: expert15441463Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15221432Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams1343Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1345Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)51.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%86.7%Claude Fable 5.1
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 390.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
FrontierMath, tier 487.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
ProofBench100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: math15311412Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work15411435Claude Fable 5.1
MathArena78.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
MMLU Pro92.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)88.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified70.8%40.4%Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: science15321433Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15311456Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: legal and government15141415Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14931413Claude Fable 5.1
PRBench Finance50.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
PRBench Legal51.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites13121052Claude Fable 5.1
Design Arena: UI components1336942Claude Fable 5.1
Design Arena: game dev1381956Claude Fable 5.1
Design Arena: data viz1345950Claude Fable 5.1
Design Arena: 3D1392997Claude Fable 5.1
Design Arena: all code categories13351032Claude Fable 5.1
Design Arena: SVG1300Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1323Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
LiveBench data analysis80.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)74.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)91.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)85.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
DTBench97.6%80.3%Claude Fable 5.1
LMCA65.5%29.3%Claude Fable 5.1
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Furniture assembly70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Text15121415Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: instruction following15181386Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: creative writing15091384Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Vision1319Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: English15061429Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: non-English15081397Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: Chinese15841481Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: German14991408Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: Japanese15621386Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: Korean15171375Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: French1523Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish15201389Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: Russian15201401Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: Polish15251390Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14931406Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: longer queries15241400Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: writing and language15101388Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14971370Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Vision: English1313Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1391Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1327Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1318Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1330Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Fable 5.1$0.035Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.1$0.650Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.1$2.50Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Fable 5.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 1, 2026July 25, 2025
Context window1M128K
Input $/Mtok$10.00$0.45
Output $/Mtok$50.00$3.50
Coding index84.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Only Claude Fable 5.1 has a coding score, 84.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for output tokens 14.3x cheaper ($3.50 vs $50.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Claude Fable 5.1, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Fable 5.1's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next