LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 45 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Coding
5.4
Overall
10.8
Output $/M
$0.80
0
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
Coding
69.9
Overall
39.6
Output $/M
$3.75
45
vs boards won of 45 shared

Decision reading

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding: it scores 69.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 5.4 for Trinity Large Thinking.

Pick Trinity Large Thinking when output tokens cost 4.7x less.

Shared results
45
Trinity Large Thinking only
7
Gemini 3.7 Flash only
67
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Trinity Large Thinking 5.4 from 1 benchmark, Gemini 3.7 Flash 69.9 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 40.0 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Trinity Large Thinking 1231 against Gemini 3.7 Flash 1587, 59.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Trinity Large Thinking $0.80 against Gemini 3.7 Flash $3.75 per million output tokens, 4.7x apart.
Context window
Trinity Large Thinking takes 262K tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryTrinity Large ThinkingBarsGemini 3.7 FlashTies
Coding07
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design08
General018
All shared boards045
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured80.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev12381591Gemini 3.7 Flash
AA Coding Index25.871.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured88.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured80.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured12.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured34.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SciCode40.6%59.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.7%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
FrontierCodeNot measured43.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierSWENot measured20.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured904.3Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding13571499Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT13621498Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React12311587Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML12401593Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1599Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.839.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured158.0Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1224Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1208Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1230Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1247Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1264Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1235Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1028Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured56.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured28.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured59.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured34.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured7.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.1%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Remote Labor IndexNot measured5.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured87.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%94.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%47.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured94.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured95.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured84.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured66.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13421495Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: expert13591512Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13561487Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1329Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1320Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured97.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured71.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured36.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math13651511Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work13501502Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured90.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured53.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured69.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science13551511Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13491494Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government13451496Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance13291479Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites11371304Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: UI components10451299Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: game dev10791318Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: data viz10981315Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: 3D10821308Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories11171308Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: SVG10161283Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII art10411276Gemini 3.7 Flash
LiveBench designNot measured73.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured68.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IFBench56.3%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%83.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
DTBenchNot measured96.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMCANot measured50.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured26.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text13401489Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following13261484Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing13081488Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1314Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English13561483Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English13251487Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese13711552Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: German13561506Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13121511Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13061481Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: French13661500Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish13271495Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian13381515Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish13121503Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn13201485Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries13181492Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language13171491Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12961477Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1309Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1394Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1299Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.0006Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.015Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.049Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.058Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.188Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Trinity Large Thinking and Gemini 3.7 Flash
SpecificationArcee AI Trinity Large ThinkingGoogle Gemini 3.7 Flash
MakerArcee AIGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026August 13, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.75
Output $/Mtok$0.80$3.75
Coding index5.469.9
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.78
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Trinity Large Thinking better than Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding: it scores 69.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 5.4 for Trinity Large Thinking. Pick Trinity Large Thinking when output tokens cost 4.7x less.

Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 and $3.75. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.7 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Trinity Large Thinking vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Trinity Large Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Gemini 3.7 Flash's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next