Nova Pro 1.0 vs Grok 4.7
Updated October 21, 2026. 33 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Only Grok 4.7 has a coding score, 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.9x less.
- Shared results
- 33
- Nova Pro 1.0 only
- 9
- Grok 4.7 only
- 66
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Grok 4.7 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 leads, 46.4 against 7.0.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 leads, 1254 against 796.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Grok 4.7 has a Vals Index result, 58.6%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 takes 500K tokens against 300K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Pro 1.0
Nova Pro 1.0 $0.0024, Grok 4.7 $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Grok 4.7 66.7 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Web design, 57.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Nova Pro 1.0 21.0% against Grok 4.7 80.0%, 59.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Grok 4.7 $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
- Context window
- Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Grok 4.7 500K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nova Pro 1.0 | Bars | Grok 4.7 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 4 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 0 | 19 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 33 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 84.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1637 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 28.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.7% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 42.9% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.3% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 57.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 47.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 29.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1270 | 1432 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1271 | 1421 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1663 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1627 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1586 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.0 | 46.4 | Grok 4.7 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 154.4 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 86.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 60.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 50.1% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.3% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 34.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.1% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 18.3% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.3% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 34.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 54.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $10,537 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 82.7% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 25.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 49.9% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.2% | 43.1% | Grok 4.7 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 92.7% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 90.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 61.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 41.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 29.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1246 | 1415 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1211 | 1439 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1259 | 1427 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1254 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1309 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 7.0 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 7.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 98.1% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 53.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 17.1% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 26.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1252 | 1414 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1261 | 1435 | Grok 4.7 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 49.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 56.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MMLU | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1255 | 1419 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1260 | 1395 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1281 | 1423 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1229 | 1389 | Grok 4.7 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 796 | 1254 | Grok 4.7 |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1273 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1312 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1235 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1270 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1271 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 78.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 58.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 76.9% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 89.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| IFBench | 38.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 21.0% | 80.0% | Grok 4.7 |
| DTBench | Not measured | 96.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 49.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 20.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1399 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1235 | 1406 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1212 | 1381 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1231 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1276 | 1411 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1233 | 1386 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1244 | 1449 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1243 | 1366 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1200 | 1359 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1203 | 1383 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1271 | 1431 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1182 | 1406 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1240 | 1399 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1420 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1246 | 1394 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1255 | 1416 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1247 | 1394 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1210 | 1376 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 987 | 1229 | Grok 4.7 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1250 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1241 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1217 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Pro 1.0 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nova Pro 1.0 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nova Pro 1.0 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Amazon Nova Pro 1.0 | SpaceXAI Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Amazon | xAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 5, 2024 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 300K | 500K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.80 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.20 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 66.7 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Grok 4.7 for coding?
Only Grok 4.7 has a coding score, 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.9x less.
Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Grok 4.7?
Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7, with 500K tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs Grok 4.7 comparison based on?
33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.7's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.