Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 34 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova Pro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
7.0
Output $/M
$3.20
0
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
Coding
58.0
Overall
39.6
Output $/M
$3.75
34
vs boards won of 34 shared

Decision reading

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.2x less.

Shared results
34
Nova Pro 1.0 only
8
Gemini 3.7 Flash only
78
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Gemini 3.7 Flash 58.0 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 63.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: Nova Pro 1.0 796 against Gemini 3.7 Flash 1304, 63.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Gemini 3.7 Flash $3.75 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Pro 1.0BarsGemini 3.7 FlashTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design01
General019
All shared boards034
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured80.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1591Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.5Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured88.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured80.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured12.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured34.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured59.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured43.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierSWENot measured20.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured904.3Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding12701499Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT12711498Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1587Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1593Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1599Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.039.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured158.0Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1223Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1208Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1232Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1248Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1264Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1235Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1022Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured56.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured28.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured59.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured22.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured34.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured7.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured67.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Remote Labor IndexNot measured5.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured87.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.9%94.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.2%47.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured94.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured95.5%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured84.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured66.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12461495Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: expert12111512Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12591487Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1329Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1320Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured97.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured71.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured36.6%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math12521511Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work12611502Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured90.1%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured53.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured69.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MMLU82.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12551511Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12601494Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government12811496Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance12291479Gemini 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites7961304Gemini 3.7 Flash
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1299Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1318Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1314Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1283Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1276Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LiveBench designNot measured73.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
General benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured68.0%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.2%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
IFBench38.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)21.0%83.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash
DTBenchNot measured96.8%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMCANot measured50.4%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured26.7%Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text12591489Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following12351484Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing12121488Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision9801314Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: English12761483Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English12331487Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese12441552Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: German12431506Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese12001511Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean12031481Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: French12711500Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish11821495Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian12401515Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1503Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12461485Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries12551492Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language12471491Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12101477Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: English9871309Gemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1394Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1299Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Gemini 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Gemini 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.0024Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request

Nova Pro 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.050Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.049Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.192Fits in one request
Gemini 3.7 Flash$0.188Fits in one request

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemini 3.7 Flash
SpecificationAmazon Nova Pro 1.0Google Gemini 3.7 Flash
MakerAmazonGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024August 13, 2026
Context window300K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.80$0.75
Output $/Mtok$3.20$3.75
Coding indexNot benchmarked58.0
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.78
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Gemini 3.7 Flash for coding?

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a coding score, 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.2x less.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 and $3.75. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.7 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.7 Flash's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next