LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Updated October 21, 2026. 22 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
61.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
7
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
Coding
72.6
Overall
46.3
Output $/M
$0.87
15
vs boards won of 22 shared

Decision reading

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 72.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.6 for Hy4 preview.

Pick Hy4 preview when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
22
Hy4 preview only
2
MiMo-V2.6-Pro only
51
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Hy4 preview 61.6 from 1 benchmark, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 72.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 7.7 points apart on average over 10 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Hy4 preview 8.1% against MiMo-V2.6-Pro 31.3%, 23.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Hy4 preview $2.501 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Hy4 preview takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryHy4 previewBarsMiMo-V2.6-ProTies
Coding55
Agentic work16
Math10
Knowledge01
General03
All shared boards715
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index55
Coding benchmarks for Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev16311625Hy4 preview
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)8.1%31.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)77.5%85.2%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)47.4%43.0%Hy4 preview
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.5%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
IOI (Vals AI)59.3%39.3%Hy4 preview
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)55.1%67.8%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)65.4%72.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SciCodeNot measured60.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1158.1Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1533Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1528Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: React16531639Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML16201616Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1598Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured46.3Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
Agentic work benchmarks for Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1291Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured88.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured47.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SREBench (Vals AI)2.3%3.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Finance Agent (Vals AI)55.1%57.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.6%32.4%Hy4 preview
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%47.1%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)8.8%13.8%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)58.1%62.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)69.3%Not measuredOnly Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%2.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-AgentsNot measured54.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured79.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured49.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1541Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1520Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1281Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1264Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
ProofBench75.0%70.0%Hy4 preview
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1500Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly Hy4 preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.3%45.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1506Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1497Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1485Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1468Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1308Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1338Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1314Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1337Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1330Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1317Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
General benchmarks for Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Vals Index53.2%57.8%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.6%68.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.6%88.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured86.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena TextNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1504Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1474Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1529Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1479Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1501Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1465Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.0009Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.024Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.096Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SpecificationTencent Hy4 previewXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MakerTencentXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 28, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.834$0.435
Output $/Mtok$2.501$0.87
Coding index61.672.6
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Hy4 preview better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 72.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.6 for Hy4 preview. Pick Hy4 preview when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Hy4 preview costs $0.834 per million input tokens and $2.501 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Hy4 preview's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiMo-V2.6-Pro's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next