Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B leads Mistral Large 4 on coding, 74.2 to 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.8 27B costs 1.6x less per output token ($2.55 vs $4.18 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 57 benchmarks have a result for both.
Mistral Large 4 or Qwen3.8 27B: which to pick
Pick Qwen3.8 27B for coding: it scores 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.4 for Mistral Large 4, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.
Pick Mistral Large 4 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 57
- Mistral Large 4 only
- 24
- Qwen3.8 27B only
- 28
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B scores 74.2 against 56.4.
5 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 leads, 38.4 against 33.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Qwen3.8 27B has a AA Agentic Index result, 45.8.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Qwen3.8 27B has a GPQA Diamond result, 88.9%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Qwen3.8 27B has a MMLU Pro result, 84.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Mistral Large 4 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1257.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.8 27B
Mistral Large 4 $0.0034, Qwen3.8 27B $0.0017 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Qwen3.8 27B has the number, $1.26.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Mistral Large 4 56.4 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 27B 74.2 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 12.3 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveBench research: Mistral Large 4 28.1% against Qwen3.8 27B 59.4%, 31.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Mistral Large 4 $4.18 against Qwen3.8 27B $2.55 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
- Context window
- Mistral Large 4 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.8 27B 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Mistral Large 4 | Bars | Qwen3.8 27B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 4 | 6 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 6 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 3 | ||
| Math | 2 | 1 | ||
| Knowledge | 2 | 3 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 8 | 15 | ||
| All shared boards | 21 | 36 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index46
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 60.0% | 86.8% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena WebDev | 1543 | 1593 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 68.1 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.0% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.0% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 27.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 78.4% | 64.8% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 30.6% | 14.2% | Mistral Large 4 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 45.3% | 39.1% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 58.4% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 33.1% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 14.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.1% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.8% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| SciCode | 54.2% | 46.6% | Mistral Large 4 |
| FrontierCode | 39.4% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1213.2 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1478 | 1483 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1467 | 1478 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1559 | 1602 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1487 | 1570 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1577 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 38.4 | 33.7 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.0 | 151.7 | Qwen3.8 27B |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 45.8 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LiveBench research | 28.1% | 59.4% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LiveBench browser | 8.0% | 32.0% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LiveBench long agentic | 11.8% | 27.9% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 54.7% | 48.5% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 30.4% | 30.9% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 31.7% | 36.1% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 17.5% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 56.2% | 59.7% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 47.5% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 88.9% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 83.9% | 80.0% | Mistral Large 4 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 12.2% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.9% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 90.5% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 35.0% | 33.9% | Mistral Large 4 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 88.1% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 87.5% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 42.4% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Chess puzzles | 33.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 17.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1444 | 1459 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1444 | 1479 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1442 | 1461 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1288 | 1285 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1295 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 58.6% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 26.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| ProofBench | 10.0% | 16.0% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: math | 1469 | 1455 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1462 | 1458 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 84.3% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.4% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 70.8% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.9% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 40.7% | 28.7% | Mistral Large 4 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 20.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1448 | 1467 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1433 | 1437 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1425 | 1447 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1439 | 1438 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1257 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1272 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1225 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1275 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1252 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1259 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1232 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1202 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| LiveBench design | 65.6% | 75.9% | Qwen3.8 27B |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index815
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 76.5% | 76.6% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.4% | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 80.4% | 83.8% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 81.3% | 82.0% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| DTBench | 88.2% | 88.0% | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMCA | 35.8% | 41.4% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 28.1% | 45.0% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Furniture assembly | 20.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1431 | 1440 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1422 | 1436 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1363 | 1383 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Vision | 1272 | 1269 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1433 | 1448 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1422 | 1428 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1492 | 1501 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1443 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1415 | 1387 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1384 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1492 | 1465 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1455 | 1449 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1417 | 1415 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1439 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1435 | 1440 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1428 | 1448 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1386 | 1405 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1378 | 1393 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1283 | 1267 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1326 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1284 | 1281 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1235 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1237 | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.8 27B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.8 27B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.8 27B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | October 6, 2026 | August 14, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.36 | $0.425 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.18 | $2.55 |
| Coding index | 56.4 | 74.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $1.26 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Mistral Large 4 better than Qwen3.8 27B for coding?
Pick Qwen3.8 27B for coding: it scores 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.4 for Mistral Large 4, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick Mistral Large 4 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 4 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 per million input tokens and $4.18 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.425 and $2.55. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 27B only.
Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Large 4 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8 27B comparison based on?
57 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Large 4's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 27B's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.