MiniMax M3 vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads MiniMax M3 on coding, 50.0 to 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5 costs 3.6x less per output token ($0.336 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 80 benchmarks have a result for both.
MiniMax M3 or MiMo-V2.5: which to pick
Pick MiMo-V2.5 for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.2 for MiniMax M3, though on 3 benchmarks against 6.
Pick MiniMax M3 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or AA Coding Index, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 80
- MiniMax M3 only
- 36
- MiMo-V2.5 only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 scores 50.0 against 39.2.
6 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 29.2 against 21.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 29.5 against 15.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 92.7% against 81.6%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 leads, 84.2% against 82.9%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads, 1265 against 1257.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5
MiniMax M3 $0.0009, MiMo-V2.5 $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiMo-V2.5
MiniMax M3 $0.56, MiMo-V2.5 $0.01.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5 50.0 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 11.3 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Legal Research Bench (Vals AI): MiniMax M3 29.8% against MiMo-V2.5 9.1%, 20.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- MiniMax M3 $1.20 against MiMo-V2.5 $0.336 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
- Context window
- MiniMax M3 takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.5 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | MiniMax M3 | Bars | MiMo-V2.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 13 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 4 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 6 | 3 | ||
| Math | 1 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 10 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 7 | ||
| General | 23 | 6 | ||
| All shared boards | 59 | 21 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index131
| Benchmark | MiniMax M3 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 70.9% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1482 | 1438 | MiniMax M3 |
| AA Coding Index | 58.6 | 56.8 | MiniMax M3 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 82.2% | 81.5% | MiniMax M3 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 75.0% | 71.0% | MiniMax M3 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 1.0% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 47.6% | 42.2% | MiniMax M3 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 19.9% | 14.2% | MiniMax M3 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 53.6% | 60.7% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 33.3% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 9.2% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 51.5% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 65.0% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SciCode | 47.1% | 43.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.4% | 41.7% | MiniMax M3 |
| FrontierCode | 14.7% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 640.0 | 514.0 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1470 | 1469 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1466 | 1463 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1478 | 1425 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1455 | 1429 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1470 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | MiniMax M3 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 29.2 | 21.8 | MiniMax M3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.9 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42
| Benchmark | MiniMax M3 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 29.5 | 15.8 | MiniMax M3 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1200 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1197 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1169 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1159 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1158 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1130 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1181 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1028 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench research | 68.0% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 8.0% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 12.4% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 48.3% | 36.7% | MiniMax M3 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 20.6% | 7.8% | MiniMax M3 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 29.8% | 9.1% | MiniMax M3 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 47.8% | 55.1% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 88.9% | 90.6% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| APEX-Agents | 37.7% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 4.6% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $2,158 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index63
| Benchmark | MiniMax M3 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | 81.6% | MiniMax M3 |
| LiveBench reasoning | 74.5% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 81.2% | 80.0% | MiniMax M3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.9% | 84.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.0% | 27.2% | MiniMax M3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.9% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SimpleBench | 45.8% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 13.0% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 8.0% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1447 | 1450 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1461 | 1459 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1455 | 1461 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1266 | 1269 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1268 | 1262 | MiniMax M3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
| Benchmark | MiniMax M3 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 71.1% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| ProofBench | 18.0% | 16.0% | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1429 | 1436 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1448 | 1451 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
| Benchmark | MiniMax M3 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 84.2% | 82.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 85.4% | 78.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 68.1% | 59.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 72.7% | 71.8% | MiniMax M3 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.4% | 59.3% | MiniMax M3 |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 46.3% | 31.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1452 | 1440 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1441 | 1432 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1437 | 1425 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1434 | 1432 | MiniMax M3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
| Benchmark | MiniMax M3 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1257 | 1265 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1242 | 1255 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1210 | 1249 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1236 | 1250 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1208 | 1215 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1247 | 1260 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1161 | 1179 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1161 | 1140 | MiniMax M3 |
| LiveBench design | 66.2% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index236
| Benchmark | MiniMax M3 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 76.2% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 64.1% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 50.6% | 43.3% | MiniMax M3 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 87.3% | 72.2% | MiniMax M3 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 60.0% | 52.8% | MiniMax M3 |
| IFBench | 82.9% | 67.1% | MiniMax M3 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.0% | 73.0% | MiniMax M3 |
| DTBench | 78.9% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMCA | 33.7% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 55.0% | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1433 | 1428 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1433 | 1435 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1404 | 1393 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision | 1251 | 1247 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1443 | 1447 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1420 | 1405 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1466 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1428 | 1421 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1380 | 1306 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1373 | 1361 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1444 | 1448 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1433 | 1414 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1426 | 1396 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1423 | 1413 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1443 | 1445 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1446 | 1445 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1419 | 1409 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1403 | 1399 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1263 | 1259 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1311 | 1326 | MiMo-V2.5 |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1259 | 1256 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1235 | 1226 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1197 | 1189 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1234 | 1230 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Document | 1435 | Not measured | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | MiniMax M3 | MiMo-V2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | MiniMax M3 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | MiniMax | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | May 31, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.168 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.20 | $0.336 |
| Coding index | 39.2 | 50.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.56 | $0.01 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is MiniMax M3 better than MiMo-V2.5 for coding?
Pick MiMo-V2.5 for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.2 for MiniMax M3, though on 3 benchmarks against 6. Pick MiniMax M3 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or AA Coding Index, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or MiMo-V2.5?
MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.168 and $0.336. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, MiniMax M3 costs $0.56 and MiMo-V2.5 $0.01.
Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M3 or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M3 vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison based on?
80 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M3's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.