Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M3 vs Step 3.5 Flash

MiniMax M3 leads Step 3.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.2 to 17.0, and Step 3.5 Flash costs 4.0x less per output token ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
34
Step 3.5 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
1
vs boards won of 35 shared

MiniMax M3 or Step 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Step 3.5 Flash for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
35
MiniMax M3 only
81
Step 3.5 Flash only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks, Step 3.5 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 12.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): MiniMax M3 83.0% against Step 3.5 Flash 63.0%, 20.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M3 $1.20 against Step 3.5 Flash $0.30 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M3 takes 1.05M tokens, Step 3.5 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M3BarsStep 3.5 FlashTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General190
All shared boards341
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding70.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev1482Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding Index58.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)19.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)33.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)9.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)65.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SciCode47.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%32.6%MiniMax M3
FrontierCode14.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-Bench640.0Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14701436MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: software and IT14661434MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: React1478Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1455Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1470Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index29.217.0MiniMax M3
Epoch Capabilities Index146.9Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index29.5Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1200Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1169Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1159Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1158Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1130Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1181Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1028Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench research68.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browser8.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agentic12.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)20.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)29.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)47.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom88.9%94.4%Step 3.5 Flash
APEX-Agents37.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.04.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$2,158Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoning74.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.9%83.1%MiniMax M3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.0%24.5%MiniMax M3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SimpleBench45.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzles13.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14471411MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: expert14611421MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14551421MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: diagrams1266Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1268Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
ProofBench18.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: math14291408MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14481421MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro84.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: science14521415MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14411408MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: legal and government14371408MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: business and finance14341394MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1257Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1242Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1210Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1236Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1208Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1247Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench design66.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index190
General benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench82.9%66.5%MiniMax M3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%63.0%MiniMax M3
DTBench78.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMCA33.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Surface Evolver Bench55.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text14331403MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: instruction following14331385MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: creative writing14041357MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision1251Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: English14431417MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: non-English14201385MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Chinese14661446MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: German14281405MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Japanese13801353MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Korean13731351MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: French14441421MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Spanish14331419MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Russian14261385MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Polish14231389MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14431404MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: longer queries14461402MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: writing and language14191372MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14031360MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: English1263Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1259Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1197Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1234Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Document1435Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Step 3.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0059Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.023Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M3 and Step 3.5 Flash
SpecificationMiniMax M3StepFun Step 3.5 Flash
MakerMiniMaxStepFun
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 31, 2026January 29, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.20$0.30
Coding index39.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M3 better than Step 3.5 Flash for coding?

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Step 3.5 Flash for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Step 3.5 Flash?

MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M3 or Step 3.5 Flash?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M3 vs Step 3.5 Flash comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M3's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Step 3.5 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next