Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.6 27B

MiniMax M3 leads Qwen3.6 27B on coding, 39.2 to 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3 costs 2.3x less per output token ($1.20 vs $2.70 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
20
Qwen3.6 27BQwen
Coding
36.8
Overall
45.3
Output $/M
$2.70
3
vs boards won of 23 shared

MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.6 27B: which to pick

Pick MiniMax M3 for coding: it scores 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B.

Pick Qwen3.6 27B for work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or OTIS Mock AIME, where it leads.

Shared results
23
MiniMax M3 only
94
Qwen3.6 27B only
2
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks, Qwen3.6 27B 36.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 20.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): MiniMax M3 47.6% against Qwen3.6 27B 11.9%, 35.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M3 $1.20 against Qwen3.6 27B $2.70 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M3 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.6 27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M3BarsQwen3.6 27BTies
Coding50
Intelligence20
Agentic work11
Reasoning40
Math01
Knowledge30
General51
All shared boards203
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27BLeader
LiveBench coding70.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev1482Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding Index58.653.7MiniMax M3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%70.0%MiniMax M3
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)47.6%11.9%MiniMax M3
Code migration (Vals AI)19.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)33.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)9.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)65.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SciCode47.1%42.8%MiniMax M3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%34.8%MiniMax M3
FrontierCode14.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-Bench640.0Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: coding1470Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1466Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1478Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1454Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1470Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index29.221.4MiniMax M3
Epoch Capabilities Index146.9146.2MiniMax M3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Agentic Index29.518.5MiniMax M3
Design Arena: agents building web apps1200Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1169Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1160Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1159Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1086Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1169Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1042Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench research68.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browser8.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agentic12.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)20.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)29.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)47.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom88.9%94.2%Qwen3.6 27B
APEX-Agents37.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.04.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$2,158Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoning74.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.9%84.2%MiniMax M3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.0%23.1%MiniMax M3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.9%85.9%MiniMax M3
SimpleBench45.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzles13.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzles8.0%7.0%MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: hard prompts1447Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1461Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1455Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1266Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1268Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%91.1%Qwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured35.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
ProofBench18.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: math1429Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1448Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27BLeader
MMLU Pro84.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured53.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.1%62.3%MiniMax M3
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.7%71.3%MiniMax M3
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.4%68.3%MiniMax M3
MedCode (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: science1451Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1439Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1434Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27BLeader
Design Arena: websites1257Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1243Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1211Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1236Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1209Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1246Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench design66.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
General benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27BLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)50.6%45.6%MiniMax M3
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench82.9%67.6%MiniMax M3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%77.3%MiniMax M3
DTBench78.9%78.1%MiniMax M3
LMCA33.7%34.5%Qwen3.6 27B
Surface Evolver Bench55.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text1432Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1432Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1403Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision1251Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: English1442Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1419Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1465Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: German1430Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1379Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1372Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1432Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1427Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1425Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1443Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1445Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1418Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1402Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1263Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1259Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1197Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1234Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Document1435Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
EQ-Bench 411501026MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.0018Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.031Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.117Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.6 27B
SpecificationMiniMax M3Qwen3.6 27B
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 31, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.45
Output $/Mtok$1.20$2.70
Coding index39.236.8
Independent measurements behind it62
Cost per solved task$0.56$1.30
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M3 better than Qwen3.6 27B for coding?

Pick MiniMax M3 for coding: it scores 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B. Pick Qwen3.6 27B for work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or OTIS Mock AIME, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.6 27B?

MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.45 and $2.70. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, MiniMax M3 costs $0.56 and Qwen3.6 27B $1.30.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.6 27B?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.6 27B comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. MiniMax M3's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 27B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/minimax-minimax-m3-vs-qwen3-6-27b" title="MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.6 27B, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/minimax-minimax-m3-vs-qwen3-6-27b">LLMBenchmark.ai, MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.6 27B</a></p>