Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

MiniMax M3 leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.2 to 21.4, and MiniMax M3 costs 1.9x less per output token ($1.20 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 63 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
29
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
34
vs boards won of 63 shared

MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which to pick

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or Mystery game puzzles, where it leads.

Shared results
63
MiniMax M3 only
54
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
3
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 9.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: MiniMax M3 71.1% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 88.9%, 17.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M3 $1.20 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M3 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M3BarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding80
Intelligence20
Agentic work11
Reasoning45
Math03
Knowledge04
Web design70
General721
All shared boards2934
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench coding70.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev14821400MiniMax M3
AA Coding Index58.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)19.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)33.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)9.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)65.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SciCode47.1%44.8%MiniMax M3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%40.9%MiniMax M3
FrontierCode14.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-Bench640.0621.9MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: coding14701464MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: software and IT14661463MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: React14781388MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: HTML14551410MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: from an image1470Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index29.221.4MiniMax M3
Epoch Capabilities Index146.9146.8MiniMax M3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Agentic Index29.5Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1200Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1169Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1158Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1159Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1178Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1042Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench research68.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browser8.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agentic12.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)20.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)29.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)47.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom88.9%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
APEX-Agents37.7%24.9%MiniMax M3
OSWorld 2.04.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$2,158Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index45
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoning74.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.9%89.3%MiniMax M3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.0%29.0%MiniMax M3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.9%86.4%MiniMax M3
SimpleBench45.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzles13.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzles8.0%18.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: hard prompts14471448Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: expert14611462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14551450MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: diagrams12661277Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: homework12681292Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%88.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured31.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ProofBench18.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: math14291453Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14481454Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MathArenaNot measured19.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
MMLU Pro84.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: science14521457Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14411455Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: legal and government14371441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: business and finance14341435Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websites12571190MiniMax M3
Design Arena: UI components12431161MiniMax M3
Design Arena: game dev12101140MiniMax M3
Design Arena: data viz12361175MiniMax M3
Design Arena: 3D12081160MiniMax M3
Design Arena: all code categories12461179MiniMax M3
Design Arena: SVG11601139MiniMax M3
Design Arena: ASCII art1161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench design66.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index721
General benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench82.9%78.8%MiniMax M3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%77.3%MiniMax M3
DTBench78.9%87.5%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMCA33.7%37.9%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Surface Evolver Bench55.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text14331437Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: instruction following14331424MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: creative writing14041402MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision12511262Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: English14431443Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: non-English14201430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Chinese14661498Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: German14281445Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Japanese13801429Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Korean13731384Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: French14441462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Spanish14331441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Russian14261430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Polish14231447Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: multi-turn14431446Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: longer queries14461441MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: writing and language14191415MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14031399MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: English12631268Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: Chinese13111314Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: reading text12591271Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: humor12351262Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things11971265Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: creative writing12341260Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Document1435Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
EQ-Bench 41150Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationMiniMax M3Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 31, 2026February 16, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.39
Output $/Mtok$1.20$2.34
Coding index39.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it61
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M3 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B for work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or Mystery game puzzles, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

63 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M3's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next