Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M3 vs Qwen-Plus

Qwen-Plus costs 1.5x less per output token than MiniMax M3 ($0.78 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
26
Qwen-PlusQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.78
1
vs boards won of 27 shared

MiniMax M3 or Qwen-Plus: which to pick

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen-Plus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen-Plus for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.78 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by DTBench, where it leads.

Shared results
27
MiniMax M3 only
89
Qwen-Plus only
1
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks, Qwen-Plus not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 30.0 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: MiniMax M3 71.1% against Qwen-Plus 17.8%, 53.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M3 $1.20 against Qwen-Plus $0.78 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M3 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen-Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M3BarsQwen-PlusTies
Coding20
Reasoning40
Math30
Knowledge40
General131
All shared boards261
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen-PlusLeader
LiveBench coding70.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev1482Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding Index58.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)19.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)33.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)9.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)65.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SciCode47.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
FrontierCode14.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-Bench640.0Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14701328MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: software and IT14661343MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: React1478Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1455Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1470Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen-PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index29.2Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.9Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen-PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index29.5Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1200Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1169Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1157Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1158Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1180Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1205Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1009Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench research68.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browser8.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agentic12.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)20.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)29.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)47.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom88.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
APEX-Agents37.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.04.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$2,158Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen-PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoning74.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.9%48.1%MiniMax M3
SimpleBench45.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzles13.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14471317MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: expert14611328MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14551333MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: diagrams1266Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1268Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen-PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%17.8%MiniMax M3
ProofBench18.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MATH level 5Not measured65.3%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: math14291326MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14481332MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen-PlusLeader
MMLU Pro84.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: science14521352MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14411350MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: legal and government14371349MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: business and finance14341303MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen-PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites1257Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1245Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1211Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1235Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1209Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1247Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1162Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench design66.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index131
General benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen-PlusLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench82.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
DTBench78.9%81.1%Qwen-Plus
LMCA33.7%24.0%MiniMax M3
Surface Evolver Bench55.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text14331326MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: instruction following14331303MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: creative writing14041292MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision1251Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: English14431339MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: non-English14201310MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Chinese14661347MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: German1428Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese13801251MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Korean1373Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: French1444Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1433Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14261323MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Polish1423Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14431336MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: longer queries14461324MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: writing and language14191296MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14031270MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: English1263Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1259Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1197Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1234Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Document1435Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Qwen-PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.015Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.060Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M3 and Qwen-Plus
SpecificationMiniMax M3Qwen-Plus
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 31, 2026February 1, 2025
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.26
Output $/Mtok$1.20$0.78
Coding index39.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M3 better than Qwen-Plus for coding?

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen-Plus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen-Plus for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.78 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by DTBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Qwen-Plus?

MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen-Plus costs $0.26 and $0.78. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M3 or Qwen-Plus?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M3 vs Qwen-Plus comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. MiniMax M3's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Qwen-Plus's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next