Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads MiMo-V2.6-Flash on coding, 59.0 to 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 2.1x less per output token ($0.28 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
Coding
59.0
Overall
60.6
Output $/M
$0.60
6
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
54.7
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$0.28
7
vs boards won of 13 shared

MiniMax M3.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.7 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($0.28 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
13
MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
7
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
53
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 59.0 from 4 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 12.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): MiniMax M3.1 Flash 48.0% against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 35.1%, 12.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M3.1 Flash takes 1M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M3.1 FlashBarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding24
Intelligence10
Agentic work12
Reasoning10
General11
All shared boards67
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index24
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LiveBench coding83.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev15871634MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)25.3%24.2%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)73.9%79.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SciCode53.4%51.3%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.2Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1499Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1497Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React16091648MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML15291641MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1596Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index42.737.9MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LiveBench research72.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic34.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%28.5%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)34.1%38.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)7.5%13.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoning82.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.0%35.1%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1475Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1496Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1493Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1276Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
ProofBenchNot measured63.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1476Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1478Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1462Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1439Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1441Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1454Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LiveBench design74.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals Index53.8%54.8%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LiveBench data analysis71.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%74.3%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena TextNot measured1453Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1452Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1403Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1256Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1476Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1431Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1509Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1458Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1359Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1425Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1480Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1453Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1409Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1455Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1447Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1459Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1424Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1415Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1231Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.036Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M3.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationMiniMax M3.1 FlashXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerMiniMaxXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 19, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.14
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.28
Coding index59.054.7
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.7 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for output tokens 2.1x cheaper ($0.28 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M3.1 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-flash" title="MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash</a></p>