Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Hy4 preview

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads Hy4 preview on coding, 59.0 to 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 4.2x less per output token ($0.60 vs $2.501 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
Coding
59.0
Overall
60.6
Output $/M
$0.60
2
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
7
vs boards won of 9 shared

MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview.

Pick Hy4 preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
9
MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
11
Hy4 preview only
15
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 59.0 from 4 benchmarks, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 8.9 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): MiniMax M3.1 Flash 25.3% against Hy4 preview 8.1%, 22.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 4.2x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M3.1 Flash takes 1M tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M3.1 FlashBarsHy4 previewTies
Coding14
Agentic work03
General10
All shared boards27
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 previewLeader
LiveBench coding83.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev15871631Hy4 preview
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)25.3%8.1%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)73.9%77.5%Hy4 preview
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
SciCode53.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React16091653Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML15291620Hy4 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index42.7Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 previewLeader
LiveBench research72.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browser92.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic34.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%32.6%Hy4 preview
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)34.1%45.2%Hy4 preview
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)7.5%8.8%Hy4 preview
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 previewLeader
LiveBench reasoning82.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 previewLeader
ProofBenchNot measured75.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 previewLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 previewLeader
LiveBench design74.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 previewLeader
Vals Index53.8%53.2%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LiveBench data analysis71.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkMiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.036Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Hy4 preview
SpecificationMiniMax M3.1 FlashTencent Hy4 preview
MakerMiniMaxTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 19, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.834
Output $/Mtok$0.60$2.501
Coding index59.044.3
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview. Pick Hy4 preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Hy4 preview?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M3.1 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Hy4 preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash-vs-tencent-hy4-preview" title="MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Hy4 preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash-vs-tencent-hy4-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Hy4 preview</a></p>