Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Nemotron 3 Ultra leads MiniMax M2.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.9 to 20.9, and MiniMax M2.1 costs 2.0x less per output token ($1.20 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 22 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
9
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
13
vs boards won of 22 shared

MiniMax M2.1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($1.20 vs $2.40 per million) and work measured by SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
22
MiniMax M2.1 only
12
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
49
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.1 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 11.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): MiniMax M2.1 67.7% against Nemotron 3 Ultra 79.3%, 11.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.1 $1.20 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.1 takes 205K tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.1BarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding12
Intelligence01
Agentic work10
Reasoning03
Knowledge14
Web design61
General02
All shared boards913
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.3Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.8%86.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)74.8%69.0%MiniMax M2.1
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)81.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured40.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%36.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Terminal-Bench36.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ALE-Bench623.8Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1467Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.922.9Nemotron 3 Ultra
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.0Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured20.1Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
τ²-Bench Telecom85.4%83.3%MiniMax M2.1
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MCP AtlasNot measured63.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA Diamond78.5%86.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.0%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.2%28.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AIME77.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)89.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
AA Math Index82.7Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)82.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProofBenchNot measured2.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1457Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%85.8%MiniMax M2.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.5%82.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.9%65.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.3%73.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
MedQA (Vals AI)91.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.1%38.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1465Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websites12011145MiniMax M2.1
Design Arena: UI components12201135MiniMax M2.1
Design Arena: game dev11341138Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: data viz12071142MiniMax M2.1
Design Arena: 3D11661132MiniMax M2.1
Design Arena: all code categories11901146MiniMax M2.1
Design Arena: SVG11311069MiniMax M2.1
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1100Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
IFBench69.9%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)67.7%79.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMCANot measured36.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena TextNot measured1445Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1454Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1427Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1498Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1474Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1473Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1454Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1437Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.0009Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.019Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.072Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationMiniMax M2.1NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerMiniMaxNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 23, 2025June 4, 2026
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.20$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarked30.0
Independent measurements behind it13
Cost per solved task$0.59Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.1 better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($1.20 vs $2.40 per million) and work measured by SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. MiniMax M2.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next