Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark Open vs MiniMax M2.7

Muse Spark Open leads MiniMax M2.7 on coding, 47.4 to 36.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M2.7 costs 3.5x less per output token ($1.20 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
16
MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
Coding
36.2
Overall
44.5
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 17 shared, 1 tied

Muse Spark Open or MiniMax M2.7: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.2 for MiniMax M2.7.

Pick MiniMax M2.7 for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
17
Muse Spark Open only
11
MiniMax M2.7 only
57
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M2.7 36.2 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 26.5 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Muse Spark Open 76.2% against MiniMax M2.7 11.9%, 64.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark Open $4.25 against MiniMax M2.7 $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark Open takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2.7 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark OpenBarsMiniMax M2.7Ties
Coding70
Intelligence10
Agentic work40
Reasoning20
Web design20
General001 tie
All shared boards1601 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7Leader
LiveBench coding73.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev15281399Muse Spark Open
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.6Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured73.8%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%11.9%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)21.2%8.7%Muse Spark Open
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured48.7%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
SciCode58.4%50.1%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.4%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured45.1%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
WeirdMLNot measured37.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
ALE-Bench1590.1599.3Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1454Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1446Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: React15291388Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: HTML14951401Muse Spark Open
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured22.8Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1145.8Muse Spark Open
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured15.3Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveBench research80.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browser36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agentic18.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.3%27.9%Muse Spark Open
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.3%6.9%Muse Spark Open
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%10.6%Muse Spark Open
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)53.7%28.4%Muse Spark Open
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured84.8%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
APEX-Agents33.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.6%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveBench reasoning73.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.0%87.4%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.9%29.6%Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1422Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1443Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1441Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7Leader
AIMENot measured91.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
ProofBenchNot measured3.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1421Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1437Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7Leader
MMLU ProNot measured80.4%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured60.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.2%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.6%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured34.4%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1416Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1409Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1403Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1407Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7Leader
Design Arena: websites13101243Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1210Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: game dev12821209Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1233Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1195Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1233Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1137Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1136Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveBench design60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
General benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7Leader
Vals Index48.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysis60.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured79.9%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
IFBenchNot measured75.7%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%78.3%Tie
ExploitBenchNot measured13.3%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1405Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1405Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1354Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1426Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1382Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1442Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1398Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1260Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1314Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1424Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1402Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1383Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1387Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1412Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1418Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1376Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1360Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.072Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark Open and MiniMax M2.7
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark OpenMiniMax M2.7
MakerMetaMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026March 18, 2026
Context window1.05M205K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.30
Output $/Mtok$4.25$1.20
Coding index47.436.2
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark Open better than MiniMax M2.7 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.2 for MiniMax M2.7. Pick MiniMax M2.7 for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark Open or MiniMax M2.7?

Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.7 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or MiniMax M2.7?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark Open vs MiniMax M2.7 comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Spark Open's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.7's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/meta-muse-spark-open-vs-minimax-minimax-m2-7" title="Muse Spark Open vs MiniMax M2.7, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/meta-muse-spark-open-vs-minimax-minimax-m2-7">LLMBenchmark.ai, Muse Spark Open vs MiniMax M2.7</a></p>