Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Muse Spark 1.2 leads Qwen3.6 27B on coding, 55.7 to 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.6 27B costs 1.6x less per output token ($2.70 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 16 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
15
Qwen3.6 27BQwen
Coding
36.8
Overall
45.3
Output $/M
$2.70
1
vs boards won of 16 shared

Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.6 27B: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for coding: it scores 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B.

Pick Qwen3.6 27B for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($2.70 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by MortgageTax (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
16
Muse Spark 1.2 only
81
Qwen3.6 27B only
9
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3.6 27B 36.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 29.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Muse Spark 1.2 79.1% against Qwen3.6 27B 11.9%, 67.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 against Qwen3.6 27B $2.70 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.2 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.6 27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.2BarsQwen3.6 27BTies
Coding40
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Knowledge21
General40
All shared boards151
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27BLeader
LiveBench coding78.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev1534Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding Index72.253.7Muse Spark 1.2
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.6%70.0%Muse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)79.1%11.9%Muse Spark 1.2
Code migration (Vals AI)29.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)21.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)69.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SciCode57.4%42.8%Muse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
FrontierSWE12.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: coding1505Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1505Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1526Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1543Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.621.4Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1146.2Muse Spark 1.2
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Agentic Index43.218.5Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: agents building web apps1221Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1210Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1181Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1222Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1178Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1074Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1170Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench research67.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browser36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agentic21.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
APEX-Agents45.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27BLeader
LiveBench reasoning90.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.4%84.2%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)45.5%23.1%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.9%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
SimpleBench74.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzles27.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured7.0%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1489Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: expert1475Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1487Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1317Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured91.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured35.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
ProofBench43.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: math1484Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1480Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27BLeader
MMLU Pro88.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured53.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)70.9%62.3%Muse Spark 1.2
TaxEval (Vals AI)80.4%71.3%Muse Spark 1.2
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.4%68.3%Qwen3.6 27B
MedCode (Vals AI)49.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SimpleQA Verified60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: science1500Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1496Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1517Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1484Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27BLeader
Design Arena: websites1312Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: UI components1299Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: game dev1300Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1334Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1300Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1312Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1283Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1284Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench design67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27BLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.7%45.6%Muse Spark 1.2
MedScribe (Vals AI)90.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal Index69.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBenchNot measured67.6%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.0%77.3%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench94.7%78.1%Muse Spark 1.2
LMCA48.4%34.5%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text1482Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1462Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1436Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision1304Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: English1483Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1476Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1509Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1462Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: French1495Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1484Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1483Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1502Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1473Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1453Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1443Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: English1291Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1313Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1026Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.0018Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.031Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.117Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 27B
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 27B
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 5, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.45
Output $/Mtok$4.25$2.70
Coding index55.736.8
Independent measurements behind it52
Cost per solved task$0.64$1.30
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen3.6 27B for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for coding: it scores 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.8 for Qwen3.6 27B. Pick Qwen3.6 27B for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($2.70 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by MortgageTax (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.45 and $2.70. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Muse Spark 1.2 costs $0.64 and Qwen3.6 27B $1.30.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.6 27B comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Spark 1.2's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 27B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/meta-muse-spark-1-2-vs-qwen3-6-27b" title="Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.6 27B, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/meta-muse-spark-1-2-vs-qwen3-6-27b">LLMBenchmark.ai, Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.6 27B</a></p>