Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Muse Spark 1.2 leads Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 6.7, and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs 4.3x less per output token ($1.00 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 26 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
26
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 26 shared

Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($1.00 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
26
Muse Spark 1.2 only
71
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
9
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 46.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare: Muse Spark 1.2 1496 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 1187, 51.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.2 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.2BarsQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTies
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General110
All shared boards260
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured16.4%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured47.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LiveBench coding78.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev1534Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding Index72.2Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)79.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)29.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)21.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)69.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SciCode57.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
FrontierSWE12.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: coding15051276Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT15051261Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: React1526Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1543Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.66.7Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1119.5Muse Spark 1.2
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index43.2Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1221Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1210Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1181Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1222Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1179Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1085Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1172Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench research67.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browser36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agentic21.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
APEX-Agents45.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
LiveBench reasoning90.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.4%41.7%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)45.5%3.5%Muse Spark 1.2
SimpleBench74.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzles27.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14891251Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert14751221Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14871269Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagrams1317Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
ProofBench43.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GSM8KNot measured93.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14841251Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work14801243Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro88.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured63.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLUNot measured79.1%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured70.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science15001221Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14961187Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government15171257Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance14841224Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1312Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: UI components1298Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: game dev1301Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1334Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1301Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1312Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1284Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1284Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench design67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)90.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal Index69.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
DTBench94.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMCA48.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
HellaSwagNot measured83.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured80.8%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text14821230Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following14621223Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing14361174Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision1304Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: English14831248Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English14761205Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese15091222Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Korean1462Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: French1495Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1484Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14831228Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: multi-turn15021222Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries14731251Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language14531191Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14431150Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: English1291Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1313Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 5, 2026November 11, 2024
Context window1.05M33K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.66
Output $/Mtok$4.25$1.00
Coding index55.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved task$0.64Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($1.00 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?

26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Spark 1.2's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next