Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Updated October 21, 2026. 26 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.5 for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, though on 1 benchmark against 2.
Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct when output tokens cost 4.3x less.
- Shared results
- 26
- Muse Spark 1.1 only
- 70
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
- 9
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 scores 48.9 against 30.5.
1 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 leads, 33.7 against 6.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a AA Agentic Index result, 25.8.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a GPQA Diamond result, 91.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a MMLU Pro result, 88.7%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1270.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 takes 1.05M tokens against 33K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Muse Spark 1.1 $0.0034, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $0.0012 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.1 has the number, $0.43.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Muse Spark 1.1 48.9 from 1 benchmark, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 30.5 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 42.8 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena Text: Chinese: Muse Spark 1.1 1515 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 1222, 48.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
- Context window
- Muse Spark 1.1 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 33K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Muse Spark 1.1 | Bars | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| General | 11 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 26 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 16.4% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 47.0% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1542 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 71.3 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 85.9% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 72.2% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 31.1% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 69.3% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 59.2% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 29.5% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| SciCode | 58.8% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1498 | 1276 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1498 | 1261 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1532 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1540 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1540 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 33.7 | 6.7 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.1 | 119.5 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 25.8 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1207 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1199 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1177 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1184 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1103 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1183 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1194 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1156 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 974 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 57.2% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 38.0% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 56.4% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 1.7% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 31.8% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $6,520 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.2% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 86.6% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 89.8% | 41.7% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 46.2% | 3.5% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Chess puzzles | 34.0% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1485 | 1251 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1478 | 1221 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1480 | 1269 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1305 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1287 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 39.0% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| GSM8K | Not measured | 93.0% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1482 | 1251 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1487 | 1243 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 88.7% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 85.0% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 71.3% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 79.7% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 66.1% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 63.5% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| MMLU | Not measured | 79.1% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| AI2 Reasoning Challenge | Not measured | 70.5% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1484 | 1221 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1479 | 1187 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1481 | 1257 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1470 | 1224 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1270 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1290 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1269 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1268 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1260 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1276 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1234 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1270 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 61.3% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 45.6% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 88.9% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 66.7% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 77.7% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| DTBench | 94.4% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMCA | 49.9% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| HellaSwag | Not measured | 83.0% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| WinoGrande | Not measured | 80.8% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text | 1478 | 1230 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1457 | 1223 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1435 | 1174 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1478 | 1248 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1471 | 1205 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1515 | 1222 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1469 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1450 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1459 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1492 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1464 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1482 | 1228 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1499 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1484 | 1222 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1462 | 1251 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1448 | 1191 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1438 | 1150 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1292 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1348 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1301 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1288 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1253 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Document | 1465 | Not measured | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meta Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | July 16, 2026 | November 11, 2024 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 33K |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.25 | $0.66 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.25 | $1.00 |
| Coding index | 48.9 | 30.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.43 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.5 for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct when output tokens cost 4.3x less.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?
26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Spark 1.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.